By Gina Dizon
SAGADA, MOUNTAIN
PROVINCE – Portions of the Mission compound located along borders near
residential houses within the poblacion here proposed as diversion road ignited opposing
views from local and overseas folks from
this town with calls for public consultation.
This 700 meter
diversion road requested for funding coursed through the office
of congressman Maximo Dalog endorsed by the Standing
Committee of the Episcopal Diocese of Northern Philippines (EDNP) forwarded
arguments of resolving the traffic congestion of Sagada especially
during times of heavy influx of tourists.
In a phone interview,
Dalog said a Dantay-Sagada Diversion Road to be constructed along
borders of Deccan Poblacion to Daoangan was forwarded for
endorsement to the Regional Development Council
for inclusion in the 2016 budget following proposals from church
leaders.
A nearly 1 kilometer
road upgrading from Ambasing to Sumaguing is included in the herein proposed
Dantay-Sagada Diversion Road.
The proposed diversion
road starts from the main road near the terminal to borders near residential
houses and private properties in sitio Deccan following the creek towards sitio
Sayoksok on to the boundaries and join with the Daoangan road, a section of the
13 kilometer Dantay-Sagada road.
‘The Department of
Public Works and Highways (DPWH) shall do the necessary survey and estimate of
the required cost upon approval of the proposal’, Mountain Province –DPWH District
Engr Wilbur Likigan said.
‘There is no estimated
cost of the project yet’, Likigan added.
Said diversion road
covered the same heavily opposed new road opening as noted in a
previous congregational assembly, public consultation in 2014 and a petition
signed by some 200 plus signatories who called on the supposedly
implementing unit of the local government unit of Sagada and the source
of P1.9 M fund, the Cordillera Highland Agricultural Resource Management
Project (CHARMP) to realign the allloted amount instead to building
parking spaces.
A major opposition was
the destruction of the greeneries including cutting of trees as proposed
road cuts across pine laden slopes while posing vulnerability to pollution and
noise to the tranquil Mission compound, including inviting business
intents near roadsides.
Sentiments two years ago
remained during a recent meeting of the Church of St Mary the Virgin Vestry
with Bishop Brent Alawas with the eventual conduct of a workshop to plot
development plans for the Mission Compound including a road, CSMV Senior Warden
Dave Gulian said.
Gulian who was keen on
the need for consultation, said results of the workshop shall determine the
fate of what the Mission Compound shall look like and what areas to improve.
Alawas in an
earlier interview when asked on his position on the same
proposed diversion road proposed in 2014 said, ‘what the
congregation says’ echoing the relatively same statement that results of
the workshop shall be considered.
A strong suggestion
posed instead is the improvement of the existing rugged dirt road from
the church gate near the main road leading to St Mary’s School and forking down
towards the rugged road leading to the softball ground, Gulian added.
The Mission Compound is a
32 hectare lot found within Sagada Poblacion donated by Sagada’s forebears and
registered under the Episcopal Church in the Philippines- EDNP as the owner of
the property.
A Permit to Enter
was issued by EDNP Diocesan Bishop Brent Alawas and co signed by Poblacion
Patay barangay Chairman Dennis Lopez and the clergy chairman of the
Standing Committee.
Meantime, the Standing
Committee has been criticized by some residents of Sagada asking why said
Committee endorsed said project without consulting the Sagada congregation.
Majority of the members of the Standing Committee come from places outside of
Sagada.
Sagada resident Nellie
Pit-og, member of the Standing Committee said she signed said road proposal
with the assumption that the proposed project referred to the improvement of
the existing rugged road from the Coop store near the main road to St Mary’s
School. No technical plan was shown to the Standing Committee. A
main argument presented to the Committee on the proposed road was the decongestion
of traffic on the main road.
Meantime in Facebook,
strong opposition was gathered from the iSagada both from town-based residents
and those from overseas who called for consultation and No to Diversion Road.
Manila-based
Episcopalian Raymond Alipit said, ’let us remind Bishop Brent that the EDNP
church is not his and he had better be with us his flock in having first a
consultative meeting of the congregation with his presence.”
US based Hilda Longid
Aquino said, “The SMV compound is like Central Park in Manhattan, a quiet,
natural safe haven for those who just want to enjoy a relaxing stroll or feel
the spiritual synchrony with nature, away from the busy activities of the
town.”
Long time Sagada
resident American Steve Rogers married
to an iSagada said, “What's saddest, to me, is that the real losers are the
children. My older kids, now in college, grew up playing in that court area.
For my almost 6 year old Sumedca , and his friends it is like their own
backyard. They went to day care and 2 years of kinder there, so it's totally
familiar. There's no traffic, there are always adults around to keep half an
eye on them, their older siblings and cousins are around... like a home where
they can meet and play, on their own but still safe. On any given afternoon
that area will be filled with kids, from pre-school to high school. What reason
for building a road is compelling enough to sacrifice that?"
The heavily talked about
route of the diversion road cuts through the present Kindergarten School built
since the 1950s catering to young school children year after year.
“By opening up the
mission compound , we also are opening up a can of worms here...there will be
other problems on top of issues that can be solved not by a diversion
road, but by a sense of discipline, a sense of purpose to preserve, uphold,
persevere and respect our sacred heritage lands”, US based nurse Aida Yodong
said.
Episcopalian who
traces his roots from Sagada, George Gewan who resides in Mindanao said,
“I speak with the SMS alumni here in Mindanao to express our vehement
opposition to the plan to build a road thru the church compound. Such a move
would open a Pandora's box, i.e. unwanted noise, pollution, etc. that will
break the serene atmosphere conducive for worship and study.”
The Mission
compound established in the early 1900s by American missionaries
compose a distinct heritage site with the presence of century old
buildings- church, hospital, school buildings and lodging quarters-
in a sprawling
32 hectare
compound hosting grounds for public use as ball grounds and the cemetery.
A major argument
forwarded by church authorities is the decongestion of traffic although this
contention is debunked by sentiments from local residents who claim a
systematic management of the traffic in the past Lenten season and the previous
two weeks when tourists came in heavy numbers proved that traffic can be
managed with cars directed to a main parking site and prevented to park along
the narrow streets in town.
A Sagada resident who
goes by the name Aman Cap-uy in Facebook said “traffic congestion has been
addressed by the implementation of the car-less ordinance. We have seen how
effective it is with its strict implementation. During peak seasons, we make
use of Tangeb going through the church as a way for us to go across the town
free from vehicles and people passing by. Tangeb and the mission compound are
the only places in the center of the town where we can get away from the hustle
and bustle created by tourism and where people both locals and tourists can
enjoy nature and tranquility being a sanctuary without going into the outskirts
of this town who proposed the road? Surely not the people.”
Local resident Chiqui
Say-awen suggested that the support fund from Dalog instead be realigned
to school buildings. Say-awen was joined by Australia based Juliet
Tumapang Comafay and Melchora Calang-ad Chin who forwarded that support fund be
directed into “solving issues in community health clinics, water and
sanitation, and not to the building of a road that is not even environmentally
safe to all people concerned.”
Drainage is seen as a
major threat especially to low lying residential houses at Sayoksok.
Others suggest that
support fund instead be used for parking space at the southern end of the
church’s property near the Daoangan road.
Other residents of the
town are in favor of the proposed diversion road.
Dalog urged the unity of
the people to resolve their issues.
Hi, Gina (if I may). I’m a Manila resident who is saddened by this development because of two reasons:
ReplyDelete1) “A main argument presented to the Committee on the proposed road was the decongestion of traffic on the main road.”
Many studies have shown that building more roads only eases congestion temporarily. In fact, when we build more roads, we are rewarding people for driving and they will drive more vehicles. Please see this article: http://www.citylab.com/commute/2015/03/the-one-chart-that-explains-all-your-traffic-woes/386594/
2) The community will lose a calm space in which to walk, relax, and enjoy the outdoors.
Having such a space does wonders for building a healthy and vibrant community.
Perhaps you can use this article (http://www.interaksyon.com/whats-the-big-picture-and-other-questions-we-should-ask-before-building-another-road) as a springboard for discussion with the people who want to build the diversion roads?
May I also suggest that someone in the community begin an online petition, perhaps on www.change.org? This will enable Filipinos from all over the world to sign and support the community in its battle against the proposed diversion road.
All the best,
Dinna Dayao