PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
Perry Diaz
Right
after the Philippine Congress proclaimed Rodrigo Duterte president of the
Philippines, Chinese President Xi Jinping didn’t waste any time writing a congratulatory
message to him. Elated by Xi’s gesture, Duterte said, “I was honored,
receiving a congratulatory message from a great president.”
Several days later, Duterte -- who was
seemingly buoyed by Xi’s expression of goodwill -- remarked that he would not
resort to violence. He declared that that his government was “willing to
talk with China over the maritime dispute instead of waging a war.” “War
is a dirty word,” he quipped.
It must have sounded like a sweet melody to
Xi. Indeed, he might have felt that his “China Dream” was just about to
be fulfilled. But then… several days later, his world turned upside
down! The Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) had just handed China a
stunning defeat to her claim to 90% of the entire South China Sea (SCS).
It seemed like a bad dream, a nightmare! But then he must have realized
that it wasn’t a dream. It’s very real.
Revelation
But
what happened next revealed China’s true intent. In an extraordinary
move, China went on a diplomatic overdrive and tried to bamboozle the Duterte
administration into submission. That was a big – no, stupid! – mistake on
the part of the Chinese. They just blew what could have been a productive
bilateral relationship, which would have settled their territorial disputes
once and for all.
Xi would have gotten everything he wanted
while Duterte would be happy with a railway in Mindanao. Would it have
been an equitable trade? Not by any means. But Duterte’s wish would
have been granted – “No war!”
In an article, “Man in the Middle:
Rodrigo Duterte Gets a Taste of China’s Heavy Hand,” published in the Wall
Street Journal, columnist Andrew Browne wrote: “On the afternoon of July
12, Mr. Duterte was irritated, according to one of his closest aides. He felt
China was toying with him.
“A cabinet meeting had just received word
live from The Hague of Manila’s stunning victory in its legal challenge to
China’s claims in the South China Sea, and after noisy clapping and jubilant
fist-pumping around the table the first order of business was to issue a public
statement. A minister spoke up: He’d had dinner the previous night with the
Chinese ambassador.
“That got Mr. Duterte’s attention. ‘Are you
already a spy of the Chinese?’ he demanded, in a teasing kind of way, according
to the aide who was in the room.
“The minister then relayed a long and
detailed list of demands from the envoy about what the Philippine government
should say—and not say—when the ruling came out. Anticipating a defeat, China
was panicked at the prospect that Manila might issue a gloating statement that
would add to its humiliation.
“Mr. Duterte turned serious. What irked him,
said the person in the room, was more than just the presumptuousness of the
Chinese demands.
The president had met with the ambassador
[Zhao Jianhua] himself earlier the same day to offer reassurances. ‘Didn’t he
trust what I told him?’ asked Mr. Duterte.
“ ‘Between us guys,’ he remarked, ‘I would
have said some of those things, but because the [Chinese] embassy wants me to
say them, I won’t.’ ”
Diplomatic faux pas
Given
Duterte’s volcanic temperament, he must have felt insulted by China’s
high-handedness in trying to force him to kowtow to Xi’s demands. But
nothing could have been more insulting to him – he grew up a “kanto boy” in an
environment that abides by the law of the jungle – than a disloyal underling,
the “minister” who dined with the Chinese Ambassador, who handed him a list of
what to say and not to say about the arbitral tribunal’s ruling.
Could that “minister” be Perfecto Yasay Jr.,
whom Duterte handpicked to be his Secretary of Foreign Affairs? Given
Yasay’s professional and business background, he appeared to be his perfect
choice for the job.
But as it turned out, Yasay wasn’t perfect
after all. He committed a diplomatic faux pas that drastically changed
the dynamics of what could have been an amicable - albeit unfair – settlement
of the South China Sea disputes. However, it could have been a blessing
in disguise because it gave Duterte a quick lesson in geopolitics. And as
quickly, too, he became his own man, and not somebody’s puppet or patsy.
Boiling water
But Yasay -- whose
immersion into the treacherous waters of the South China Sea imbroglio has
taught him never to jump into boiling water -- has been rumored to be on his
way out. But last July 19, Duterte doused cold water on the rumor when he
released a video statement to clarify Yasay’s status.
He
said, “I would like to arrest a few rumors going around that Secretary Yasay of
the Department of Foreign Affairs is on his way out. I would like to assure the
Secretary that he is in good company and there is no truth to the rumor that
there is a plan for his ouster, far from it actually.”
Duterte went on to say that he
personally pleaded with Yasay to join his administration because of his
competence and honesty. But here’s the twist: He said, “Although there’s
a caveat. Actually, Secretary [Yasay] accepted the position on the condition
that he will only serve for a few months, not even a year because he has
contractual obligations to teach, professorial chair, well most universities in
the western side… California, Hawaii and somewhere else.” He went on to
say that Yasay has “his backing and full support.” But don’t they all say
that when someone is just about to be canned?
Standoff
Last
July 14, Duterte said he would send former president Fidel V. Ramos to China to
start talks on the PCA arbitral tribunal ruling. In accepting the
assignment, Ramos suggested setting aside the arbitral tribunal’s ruling to
pursue a “settlement” with China.
However,
he said that the Philippines should first convene the National Security Council
(NSC), which consists of the President, Vice President, Senate President,
Speaker of the House, and others who are chosen by Duterte. “There should be a
National Security Council [meeting] first, so that the Philippine position can
be defined,” Ramos said.
But the whole idea of setting aside the
tribunal’s ruling brings to the fore a slew of questions that the NSC has to
address, to wit: (1) Could the Philippines bring the tribunal’s ruling
back to the negotiating table at a latter time? (2) Would the Philippines
recognize China’s “nine-dash line” claim over the SCS? (3) Would the
Philippines acknowledge China’s “undisputed sovereignty” over the SCS?
(4) Would the Philippines agree to relinquish her exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
to China who claims that it is within the area demarcated by the nine-dash
line? And (5) Would the Philippines vacate and surrender Pag-asa Island,
which is part of the province of Palawan? There are more; however, these,
I believe, would be the core questions that need to be answered.
But like all successful diplomatic
negotiations, a middle ground has to be reached, and a compromise to be worked
out. In other words, the parties have to agree to a “win-win”
solution. Can this be achieved knowing that China had time and time again
declared that she would not yield an inch of territory?
Indeed, Ramos has his work cut out for
him. Let’s hope -- and pray -- that he’d be able to convince the
Chinese that while there is plenty of room for negotiation, there are certain
things that the Philippines can’t concede, which are spelled out in the
Constitution. And this is the toughest challenge for both the Philippines
and China. The question is: Who will blink first? Or, did Duterte
blink already? (PerryDiaz@gmail.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment