EDITORIAL
The entry of a digital
terrestrial television broadcast station in Baguio should be a welcome
development to improve services and lower consumer monthly billing rates.
However, the city
council approved a resolution opposing the application of Baycomms Broadcasting
Corporation for a certificate of public convenience to install, operate and
maintain their television broadcast station in the city. The council also
opposed issuance of a provisional authority pending final determination of the
merits of the application.
The local
legislative body decided to file the resolution of protest after the applicant
repeatedly failed to appear during its regular sessions the past weeks for it
to substantiate its application and explain to local legislators benefits of
having the television broadcast station.
Earlier, National
Telecommunication Commission Cordillera regional officials appeared before the
regular session of the city council but they were not able to update the local
legislators on status of pending application of Baycomms.
Thus, it was decided
to reset inquiry on the matter and invite company officials to explain merits
of their applications to local officials for them to understand the matter.
Among those invited in
last Monday’s regular session of the local legislative body but failed to
appear included Elmer V. Catulpos, president of Baycomms Broadcasting
Corporation and lawyer Bobby John B. Gaytos, legal counsel of the same company.
The city council said
the repeated failure of the company officials to appear during its regular
sessions after a series of invitation illustrated their lack of interest in
pursuing the project.
NTC-CAR officials told
local legislators in previous meetings that the local government had the right
to file their opposition to the applications of telecommunications companies
applying for the issuance of certificates of public convenience so that local
officials could impose additional conditions to make sure the environment and
health and safety of the people would be guaranteed by the applicants.
Under the terrestrial
television broadcast set up, the applicant could split one channel into six
sub-channels wherein two of the channels could be designated for pay per view,
one channel for disaster response while it could apportion the three remaining
channels for whatever purposes they want to operate the same.
The council wanted to
inquire from the television company proposed site for its facilities, detailed
plans for the broadcast station, among other issues and concerns.
The city council was
earlier furnished by the NTC central office with a copy of its notice of
hearing earlier scheduled to deliberate the application of Baycomms for the
operation of the terrestrial television broadcast station in the city for its
appropriate action and information.
The entry of Baycomms
in Baguio should have been a catalyst to improving television services. What
made Baycomms officials or representatives not to appear during council
hearings to explain their side? Is there a deeper reason for them not to do so
like “operational fees?”
No comments:
Post a Comment