BANTAY
GOBYERNO
Ike Señeres
Public schools and public hospitals are the
best known public services; because we see these and we physically go to them
as a matter of fact. The same could be said about public markets and public
works, but that is not so in the case of public attorneys and public housing.
Common sense would tell
us that public works would usually mean roads and bridges, but that should be
broadly interpreted now to mean anything that would construct any
infrastructure or any physical project that would assist in the delivery of
public services and thus improve the quality of life.
It is good to note that
the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) has already started building
public schools, but what could also be good is if they could start building
public hospitals as well.
At first I thought that
courtrooms could be the places where the people could go to seek justice, but
that is not really the case in the real world. Seeking justice would usually
mean filing suit in a court of law, but in reality, a lawyer is always needed
to do just that.
That is the reason why I
now say that the people who seek justice should now go to the Public Attorney’s
Office (PAO), on the assumption of course that they could not afford a private
lawyer. In a manner of speaking, it could be said that PAO offices are just
like private law offices, except that they could not be found in more places as
they should be.
As I see it, there is a
need to re-invent the whole process of providing free legal assistance, and one
way to do that perhaps is to outsource it to non-profit organizations, possibly
including cooperatives as well.
Perhaps unknown to many,
there is a law granting cooperatives to own and operate public markets, in
partnership with, or under the authority of Local Government Units (LGUs). I
think that this provision has a double advantage, somewhat like having two
sides to a coin.
On one side, it will
free the LGUs from the expense of building and maintaining the public markets.
On the other side, it will give the cooperatives a default business to invest
in, aside from the fact that it will automatically create a market for the
goods and services produced by their members.
Needless to say, the
LGUs could still generate incomes from local taxes, a function that they could
also delegate to the cooperatives. Looking at this from the positive side, it
may even reduce the incidents of corruption, because of the reduced involvement
of public officials.
In theory but with so
much legal basis, it could generally be said that all of the public services
mentioned here could already be owned and operated by cooperatives, including
public housing as a matter of fact. Apparently and for some reason, there seems
to be no concept of “public housing” in this country, in much the same way that
there appears to be no concept of “homeless persons” here also.
So far, what is
generally understood here is the concept of “socialized housing”, which is now
defined to mean low quality homes with short amortization periods. My wish
however that the term could be interpreted to mean high quality homes with
longer amortization periods, possibly even on a rent-to-own basis. By
comparison, rental housing would be a better offer for those who could not
afford expensive mortgages.
Imagine what would
happen if the public services mentioned here could already be owned and
operated by cooperatives? Among other things but most of all, we would have a
very big chance to reduce poverty in this country. How do we do that?
All that we have to do
really is to eat our way out of poverty, going into prosperity. That might
sound that simple to you, but it is really that simple. And what do I mean by
that? I do not have the figures right now, but I do know that we are importing
billions of pesos worth of food items and petroleum products. Can you imagine
that?
We are not only importing so much of what we
eat, but we are also importing so much of the fuel that we cook our food with.
Again I say that I do not have the figures with me right now, but can you
imagine what would happen if we import in the substitution of these imported
items?
Goods and services that
are purchased from cooperatives are generally cheaper, and for that reason
alone, co-operators could already save a lot of money. On top of the savings
however, they could also earn money not only from rebates, but also from
dividends.
Seriously, one does not
have to be a math genius to understand that with the combination of discounts,
rebates and dividends, co-operators would not only become richer, they might
also become healthier because they will be consuming organic and natural foods
that are also produced by their own members.
I have searched far and
wide, high and low, but up to now I have not found any other movement that has
the full potential of liberating the people from poverty and bringing them
forward to prosperity.
For feedback email iseneres@yahoo.com or
text +639083159262
No comments:
Post a Comment