BENCHWARMER
Ramon
Dacawi
This by-word of this age of information
technology haunts me. Somehow, it helps me understand why this Third World
country can’t clearly define and give substance to “sustainable development”,
another by-word planners continue to mouth and abuse since it emerged out of
the Rio Summit in 1992.
We are user-friendly in harnessing our
nation’s natural resources. To boost food production, we plan irrigation dams
that collect river water and channel it to farmlands. The program of work
details the infrastructure to serve the farmer as the end-user: inlet, dam,
outlet.
Until recently,
nowhere in the program of work is a provision for the conservation,
rehabilitation and maintenance of the watershed or water source. Sooner or
later, the water resource dries up, and the concrete irrigation structure ends
up as a monument to myopia and “unsustainable development”.
I wonder if the National Irrigation
Administration counted how many irrigation projects now lie in waste as a
result of “utak semento”. On a bigger scale, I was at a loss on why the
National Water Resources Board, the body that governs the use of water, was,
for years, placed under the Department of Public Works and Highways, an
infrastructure-oriented agency that then Senator Aquilino Pimentel wanted down-graded,
saying its main function is to bid out and award projects to private
contractors. It took sometime before government leaders realized the board
should be headed by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR).
Career DENR executives also rue the
user-friendly tendency of lawmakers during budgetary hearings and
allocations. Congress, they said, tends to give the bigger slice of the pie to
agriculture and less for environment and water conservation that sustain food
production.
It’s because farmers can but and trees can
not, a DENR worker told me.
Sadder – and funnier – is a seemingly
innocuous provision in the implementing rules covering the controversial
Electric Power Industry Reform Act that Congress passed in 2001. Despite
consultations conducted by the Department of Energy on the implementing rules
of the EPIRA, the “user-friendly” arrangement remains at the expense of the
resource base like the Cordillera .
As per the implementing rules, one centavo is
set aside for every kilowatt-hour sold from the production of our hydroelectric
dams. The fund, which runs to millions of pesos each year, is meant for the
resettlement of people displaced by the construction of the dam, lowering
electricity rates, providing livelihood project and watershed rehabilitation
and reforestation projects within the host communities.
The catch lies in the definition of a “host
community” or local government unit entitled to a share of the fund. As defined
in the IRR, the host LGUs are limited to those where the dam infrastructure is
located. In the case of the 345-megawatt San Roque Multi-purpose Dam therefore,
the host barangays are where the dam was built. San Manuel and San Nicolas
towns of Pangasinan are the host towns. Pangasinan is the host province and Region
1 is the host region entitled to a share from the one-centavo-per kilowatt-hour
fund.
It’s a user-friendly set-up. Energy produced
by the dam is for Pangasinan and other lowland provinces and regions. As per
plan, water harnessed from the dam would irrigate some 85,000 hectares of
lowland farmland.
But the water that runs the turbines of San
Roque will comes and will always come from Benguet, up here in the Cordillera.
The headwaters and watersheds of the Agno River, which flows into the dam, are
in the Cordillera. The water starts as a trickle from Mt. Data in Mt. Province
and swells as it flows down to Buguias, Kabayan, Bokod and Itogon towns
straddled by the Upper Agno River. Some parts of Atok and Tublay towns in
Benguet, together with Lucnab, Kias and other barangays of Baguio also
contribute to the formation of the River Agno. These upland towns and
provinces, which form the life-blood of the San Roque, are not entitled to a
share from the fund.
In a press conference when he came up for a
public hearing on the IRR of the EPIRA, then Energy Secretary Vincent Perez
said this observation of inequity was “very insightful”. He promised they would
consider a redefinition of what a “host community” is, based on the river basin
concept. When the final IRR came out, that point was not considered.
Then Ifugao Rep. Solomon Chungalao saw fit to
file a bill to rectify this injustice that his constituents also continue to
suffer, as Ifugao is also the watershed of the Magat Dam that neighboring
Isabela claims lies on its territory.
The one-centavo-per-kilowatt-hour fund, used
to be under the National Power Corp., is now managed by the Department of
Energy, as per provisions of the EPIRA. To access the fund, host LGUs and
communities must submit project proposals which the DOE would have to approve.
An NPC insider revealed that when the
Ambuclao Dam in Benguet was still that productive, a women’s group in the host
barangay of Ambuclao applied for a P30,000 allocation from the fund for a
native loom-weaving project. The proposal was never acted upon.
Over-all, the Cordillera, as a vital resource
base for national development, was and continues to be user-friendly. As such,
my Ifugao brain tells me, it pioneered and was a model of
BOT, or the build-operate-transfer scheme of development. They built the
mineral mines and the hydroelectric power dams here, and then
transferred the gold and the electric power, together with the taxes, to Makati
and Metro-Manila.
Notwithstanding the years of exploitation of
its resources in the name of national development, the Cordillera remains one
of the poorest regions in the country.
This reality on the ground should be enough
reason to support the third push for Cordillera autonomy that would enable us
to take stock of what remains of our resources, also for development, this time
for this upland region.
So we can continue to be user-friendly, this
time for ourselves. (e-mail: mondaxbench@yahoo.com for comments)
No comments:
Post a Comment