By
Mario. T. Supnad
After two years of public hearings, the House
subcommittee on labor and standards urged the Department of Transportation and
Communication to immediately approve the decision of the Land Transportation
Regulatory and Franchising Board (LTFRB) for payment of claims and benefits of
displaced thousands employees of the defunct Pantranco, a government –owned bus
company.
In his six-page report, Rep. Ronald M.
Cosalan, chairman of the House SLS, together with Reps. Rafael Mariano and
Angelo Palmones, urged the DOTC to implement the LTFRB
decision in favor of the Pantranco Employees Association (PEA) and the Pantranco
Retrenched Employees Association (PANREA), two labor unions of the company with
more than 2,500 employees, noting employees have been waiting for
almost three decades.
Cosalan also urged the DOTC to review its
rules of practice and procedures before the LTRFB, and the review of powers by
the DOTC secretary to avoid a repeat of the Pantranco case. “Justice delayed,
justice denied,” said Cosalan due to the long delayed of claims of the
employees.
The Benguet representative also wanted
that strict penalties be imposed on those not complying with Article 110
of the labor Code and other laws on execution of judgment in favor of a worker.
Congress’ action came after the employees
headed PANREA president Romy Alfonso and the PEA, now headed by Rolando
Malana, sought Cosalan’s action following the order of then DOTC
secretary Mar Roxas, temporarily suspending “for review” the sale and transfer
of the Pantranco’s Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC), although this had
been approved by LTFRB on May 21, 2012.
After the hearings, the committee had also
found out that PANREA and PEA have outstanding labor claims which are valid and
legitimate in accordance with the decision of the National Labor Relations
Commission, amounting to hundreds of millions of pesos after the bus firm
closed shop due to mismanagement.
To satisfy their monetary benefits, the NLRC
ruled the assets, together with the 777
franchises of Pantranco be awarded to the employees after a public auction
sale. Initially, 150 franchises
had been sold by the employees.
Suddenly, Roxas suspended the selling of the
remaining franchise pending review earning the ire of the employees.
Citing Labor Code of the Philippines, under
Article 110, Cosalan said “in the event of bankruptcy or liquidation of an
employer’s business his workers shall enjoy first preference as regards
their unpaid wages and monetary claims and shall be paid in full before the
claims of the government and other creditors may be paid.”
“Despite the existence of laws that
institutionalize the protection of
workers, the Pantranco case demonstrates that the law is only as
effective as its proper and timely implementation. The three-decades long struggle
of PEA and PANREA to claim what is legitimately theirs is a clear violation of
their constitutional rights and a mockery of the laws of the land,” added
Cosalan.
No comments:
Post a Comment