BAYOMBONG, Nueva
Vizcaya– The National Bureau Investigation
has cleared a retired regional trial court judge in the 2010 killing of
a human rights lawyer here.
Citing
its findings, the NBI district office led by lawyer Bensheen Apolinar asked the
Department of Justice for the dismissal of the murder case filed against former
judge Jose Rosales of RTC Branch 27 here “for lack of sufficient basis.”
In
September last year, police filed murder charges against Rosales based on the
supposed confession of murder convict Rommel Laciste, who was recaptured in
Isabela 11 days after he escaped from the National Bilibid Prison.
Before
the Cagayan police turned him over to the NBP, Laciste, with the aid of a
lawyer, executed an affidavit saying he was the one who shot dead human rights
lawyer Ernesto Salunat.
A
top-notch lawyer, Salunat, who lost thrice in his congressional bid here, was
shot four times in front of the municipal trial court in Solano town just as he
was about to ride his BMW car at around 9 a.m. on June 22, 2010.
Laciste,
30, alleged in his confession that he was hired to kill Salunat while he was
still locked up in the Isabela provincial jail for the 2006 killing of
assistant provincial probation officer Concepcion Lumanglas.
Laciste
was serving a life sentence for the Lumanglas killing when his escape from the
NBP was discovered on Aug. 15 last year.
Laciste,
who hails from San Mariano, Isabela, alleged in his affidavit that a provincial
jail guard let him loose to kill 64-year-old Salunat.
Police
said Laciste’s lookout and driver, a certain Aries Valentin, corroborated the
convict’s claim that he was hired to kill Salunat for P100,000 with Rosales as
the supposed mastermind.
However,
in its investigation letter to the local prosecutor’s office dated last April
25, the NBI said Laciste, who cannot read and write, did not explicitly mention
Rosales in his confession, contrary to his earlier claim in the first affidavit
he made in the debriefing room of the regional police in Tuguegarao City,
Cagayan.
Citing
Laciste’s latest affidavit dated March 26 this year, which was taken at the
NBP, the NBI said the convict did not mention Rosales in his confession before
the local police on Aug. 27, 2012.
“Laciste
emphasized that he did not mention the name of Judge Rosales and that he did
not know how the name was stated in his confession. Worthy to note is the fact
that Laciste is unable to read and write,” the NBI said.
Laciste’s
second affidavit was executed in the
presence of NBP chaplain Monsignor Roberto Olaguer and lawyer Aristotle Burgos.
The
NBI also noted discrepancies in Laciste’s police-extracted affidavit that he
saw Rosales as the presiding judge during his trial in another case on Dec. 5,
2006 and in January 2007 when the former judge had already retired from the
service for barely a year.
No comments:
Post a Comment