By
Aileen P. Refuerzo
BAGUIO CITY – The city government is set to
increase business and realty tax rates here, but Mayor Mauricio Domogan said
these would be reasonable.
The mayor said the city is conducting public
consultations with the various sectors to get their sentiments and to guide the
city in determining what is reasonable to both the city government and the
taxpayers.
“I hope they could speed up the consultations
and hearing to strike up what is reasonable so that the long overdue tax
adjustments can be acted upon as soon as possible,” he said.
The mayor said he will propose a conservative
increase in the executive budget for 2015 due to moderate increase in the
expected income which he said cannot be maximized due to the antiquated tax
rates.
He said the tax adjustments are now
obligatory as the rates are now outdated and not in accordance with the law.
City treasurer Alicia Onoza earlier said the
city is currently studying a proposal for a 10 percent increase in business
taxes under Tax Ordinance No. 2000-01 while city assessor Nilda Navarro said
they are updating a schedule of fair market values for submission to the Bureau
of Local Government Finance (BLGF) and eventually to the city council for
approval.
Onoza said the business tax increase is now a
must as the last time the city hiked the revenue rates was in 2001 or 13 years
ago. She said the proposed increase is reasonable as the city has
practically imposed only a ten percent adjustment from the 1974 rates under
Ordinance No. 588 -74 and since then, the rates have remained leaving the city
at the tail end of nearby cities like Urdaneta and Dagupan in Pangasinan and
San Fernando City in La Union which levy business taxes higher by as much as
500 percent.
Navarro said the city needs to update its
schedule of real property tax valuation to comply with the New Local Government
Code or the Republic Act No. 7160 provision which mandates local government
units to undertake a general revision of real property tax valuation every
three years.
The last time the city implemented the
revision was in 1996 and since 2001 when the city government adopted Tax
Ordinance 2000-001 which imposed lower assessment levels for real properties,
the city has not implemented another revision due to humanitarian considerations.
As a result of the city’s failure to comply
with the revision every three years, the city was named as among those
non-complying LGUs by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) while the city
assessor’s office has been given a poor rating by the BLGF.
Navarro assured that a minimal assessment
level will be recommended to temper the expected huge increase in the market
value as a result of the city’s passing up on several revision terms since
1996.
No comments:
Post a Comment