PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
Perry Diaz
Little did China realize that her attempt to
take over the South China Sea (SCS) would be met with resistance from the
United States as well as the Permanent Court of Arbitration. And
with the speed it took to accomplish the one-two punch against the rising
superpower in Asia-Pacific in a matter of two days, it left China with few
options, none of which – except total withdrawal -- she’d win without drawing
massive indignation or backlash from the world community.
Two
days later, on October 29, the Permanent Court of Arbitration issued its first
ruling on the arbitration case filed by the Philippines against China over the
disputed areas in the South China Sea. The five-member
arbitration tribunal, which is based at The Hague, Netherlands, unanimously
ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear the Philippines’ territorial claims
filed against China.
The
tribunal rejected China’s claim that the disputes were about its territorial
sovereignty. China claims “indisputable sovereignty” over a region that
comprises about 85% of the entire South China Sea. She has boycotted
the proceedings insisting that the arbitral tribunal doesn’t have jurisdiction
or authority to hear the case.
But
the tribunal ruled that it has the authority to hear seven of the Philippines’
submissions under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
(UNCLOS). The tribunal also made it clear that China’s decision not
to participate in the arbitration “did not deprive the tribunal of
jurisdiction.”
The
U.S. welcomed the decision of the arbitral tribunal. A U.S. defense
official said, “This demonstrates the relevance of international law to the
territorial conflicts in the South China Sea,” then added, “It demonstrates
that sovereign claims are not necessarily indisputable and it shows that
judging issues like this on the basis of international law and international
practice are a viable way of, at a minimum, managing territorial conflicts if
not resolving them.”
Core
interest
But
as China had repeatedly expressed – and threatened – in the past, she is not
going to abide by a decision that would contradict with China’s claim that the
South China Sea is “an area of ‘core interest’ that is
non-negotiable.” But would China go to war to protect her
sovereignty over the SCS? Based on her pronounced stand on the
issue, she will.
But
the $64,000 question is: Would she? And that brings to fore the
ultimate question: What is the value of “ownership” of the South China Sea to
China and why is it important that she has exclusive right over
it? To answer this question, one has to recall China’s dream of
becoming the dominant power in the Indo-Asia-Pacific region.
In
an article, “China to take Second Island Chain by 2020,” published in
the Want China Times on June 27, 2013, Admiral Liu Huaqing, the mastermind of
China’s modern naval strategy, was quoted as saying in 1982 that it would be
necessary for China to control the First and Second Island Chains by 2010 and
2020, respectively. “The PLA Navy must be ready to challenge US domination
over the Western Pacific and the Indian Ocean in 2040. If China is able to
dominate the Second Island Chain seven years from now, the East China Sea will
become the backyard of the PLA Navy,” he said.
Artificial
islands
The
following year, 2014, China started building artificial islands around seven
reefs and shoals in the Spratly archipelago. In three of these man-made
islands, China built defense fortifications, troop garrisons, runways that
could accommodate China’s biggest bombers, and deep-water harbors where her
warships could dock. Although she denied militarizing these
artificial islands, satellite photos clearly show that the structures built on
them are for military use.
President
Barack Obama’s go-signal to the U.S. Navy to patrol the waters within 12 miles
of the artificial islands was hailed by three of America’s staunchest allies,
Japan, Australia, and particularly the Philippines, which is within 200 miles
from these “unsinkable aircraft carriers,” as a U.S. senior naval officer
described them.
But
many are of the opinion that Obama’s order was “too little, too late” because
it would be hard to convince China to dismantle or abandon the artificial
islands. China would never abandon them… unless the U.S. would
go to war against her. But that will not happen. Not
now. There is just so much to lose by both countries to go to war
over these islands.
Chinese
nationalism
But
China has to react to the U.S.’s “infringement” of her sovereign
rights. However, one needs to know that China is going through an
economic downturn, falling stock values, rising unemployment, declining
exports, shrinking consumer spending, and an increasingly corrupt military and
bureaucracy. The Chinese people are edgy and Chinese President
Xi Jinping seems to blame the U.S. and Japan for all the country’s
ills.
It
did not then come as a surprise that anti-American and anti-Japanese sentiments
are running high among the Chinese people. And these are all Xi
needs to rally the people to his side. In other words, Xi could
increase his anti-American rhetoric without really going to war. He knows that
war with the U.S. at this time would be devastating to
China. Simply put, China doesn’t have the capability to defeat
the U.S. in a naval battle or crush her with nuclear power.
So,
what is China going to do to save face? An easy one would be to send
a flotilla to patrol the waters around those artificial islands and confront
U.S. warships that enter her territory. And what would the
U.S. warships do? While the two navies would be in a standoff
situation, I don't think that either side would start a
battle. However, unintended incidents could happen that could lead
to skirmish, which could bring the two countries closer to war.
Meanwhile,
China could start deploying military aircraft and warships to the militarized
artificial islands as well as building more artificial islands, which she
threatened to do as a consequence of the American
“intrusion.” What would Obama do then? Is he
going to attack or withdraw his naval forces?
Or
is he going to negotiate a compromise, one of which is to demilitarize the
artificial islands and put them under the United Nations’ control, but will
remain as the exclusive economic zones of the rightful countries as mandated by
UNCLOS. It would be a fair and equitable solution but it would be a
painful pill for China to swallow. But what else could China
do when
a double whammy hits her?
No comments:
Post a Comment