LETTERS FROM THE AGNO
Soon as I got word on the non-reappointment
of the present president of the Benguet State University last week, I knew that
colleagues would scramble for the reasons “why”. But even while, the BSU board
of regents were scheduled to meet with the CHED chair in Manila, there were
already indications that he would no longer be retained as president. That was
the reason, “why” was the easy question to answer that time.
An
evaluation team chaired by former UP President Dr. Emerlinda Roman conducted
interviews around the campus, purposely to come up with a rating as basis on
whether to re-appoint the president or not. The respondents were faculty members,
students and community members.
The
evaluation result was devastating so to speak because the president’s grade,
according to Dr. Silver Aben who talked to Alumni BoR Marvin Chagyo, was a sad
3.82 which is equivalent to a “very satisfactory” rating.
In the
excerpts of the special meeting at the Commission on Higher Education in Quezon
City on November 10 that was emailed to this space, it was learned that the
members of the evaluation committee were not unanimous in endorsing the
president for a 2nd term basing on provisions of republic act 8292 which
requires a rating of 5.0 which is equivalent to an outstanding performance.
With that,
CHED Commissioner Dr. Patricia Licuanan was quick to say to the members of the
BoR to start searching for the next president of bsu, and also told the
president that his term ends on December 5, 2015.
In the same
meeting, CHED chair Licuanan also told the president that the evaluation
committee appreciated his performance, but to be extended, it requires an
“outstanding performance” or a score of 5, based on RA 8292.
She was also
quoted as saying “we cannot extend your appointment but you can continue as
professor, exit as president and continuity of work will be done by one of your
Vice Presidents as OIC president while the search for a new president is
on-going”.
At that
instant, the members of the BoR of BSU were also ready to vote against the
president’s extension, but Dr. Licuanan was satisfied with the evaluation
report so there was no need for the members of the BoR to vote.
If I were to
be asked, my reasons for not giving the BSU president a good rating are based
on the cases that were filed against. While these are still in court, I say
that for a government employee to be indicted in a criminal case tells something
about the personality of that person.
One case
involving the BSU president is his violation of Section 261 of the Omnibus
Election Code where Comelec chair Sixto Brillantes Jr. ordered the commission’s
law department to file criminal charges against the president.
In another
instance, the performance based bonus or PBB, an extra cash bonus for
government employees was not granted to BSU. Many disgruntled BSU employees
said there was dismal failure on the part of the school’s management in
steering the institution towards good governance.
In a letter
to the BSU president last year, Budget secretary Butch Abad wrote; “we regret
to inform you that BSU is disqualified for the grant of PBB for fiscal year
2013.”
To be
eligible for the grant, the institution must meet all Good Governance
conditions set by the inter-agency task force. BSU top executives who are in
control of the conditions apparently failed.
These are
few of the reasons why I, as a bystander or observer would give the president a
failing grade.
May I now
ask those who supported the embattled BSU president during his first
appointment in 2011 to please stand up to be recognized? I am certain they also
benefited from his appointment.
********
As early as before Christmas presents are
delivered, politicians who filed their certificates of candidacy (COCs) last
October are now feeling the crunch – not that they do not have the resources to
finish campaign rounds but because solicitation letters requesting financial
assistance for any project are piled up thick on their tables.
Even La Trinidad Councilor Francis Lee who
did not file a COC for any political position said that he is not spared.
There were suggestions from radical groups to
have the election code amended as their seems to be a very wide gap of winning
chances between the wealthier candidate and the poorer one who simply wants to
serve the public by occupying an elective post.
One, Election Day on May 2016 is very far
from the date of filing of COCs. This gives bigger chances of media exposure
for candidates who have financial resources as compared to candidates who
merely depend on moral supporters and volunteer campaigners.
The playing field is tilted in favor of the
rich candidate.
No comments:
Post a Comment