By Marlo Lubguban
BONTOC,
Mountain Province – Some 71 percent of 200 who joined a forum on Cordillera
autonomy here voted yes to autonomy with 26% undecided and 3% saying no.
Both “undecided” and “no” voters urged extensive
information dissemination drives to gain greater understanding and support to
the movement.
They expressed hesitation due to lack of a filed bill in
Congress.
The mock plebiscite was held when the Cordillera Cooperative Development Authority in coordination with National Economic Development Authority-Cordillera held the forum o here Oct. 25 to gain support from cooperatives in Cordillera during commemoration of Cooperative Month here in this capital town.
The mock plebiscite was held when the Cordillera Cooperative Development Authority in coordination with National Economic Development Authority-Cordillera held the forum o here Oct. 25 to gain support from cooperatives in Cordillera during commemoration of Cooperative Month here in this capital town.
Autonomy advocates Paulino Tumapang and Gary Pekas
discussed regional autonomy in the Cordillera and its key features.
Tumapang said cooperatives have been represented in the
pursuit of autonomy with active leaders among cooperatives in Cordillera such
as Emerita Fuerte, who are also involved in drafting the proposed Cordillera
Organic Law.
Tumapang cited a provision from the proposed draft bill
forwarded to the Cordillera congressmen which states that the ARC “shall
promote and encourage creation and organization of cooperatives as instruments
of economic development, social justice, and people empowerment.”
Pekas added while creation of the Cordillera Administrative
Region did help improve the situation of the region, it is only a temporary
set-up and is less than what is envisioned in the 1987 Constitution.
One participant asked if autonomy would lessen corruption
in the region to which Pekas replied that the issue of corruption remains a
concern as long as people vote corrupt officials.
Tumapang and Pekas emphasized that autonomy is necessary
for the Cordillera not for the ending of corruption but to correct the
injustices of the past while addressing unfitting laws and policies which
relegated the unique culture and geography of the region.
In Baguio City, the Baguio City Police Office in
coordination with NEDA-Cordillera organized an information, education,
communication forum on Cordillera autonomy last Oct. 30.
Autonomy advocates Briccio Domondon and Peter Dumaguing
discussed the basic concepts of autonomy and the region’s current advocacy.
Expounding on the concept of self-determination, Deputy
City Director Edward Aquintey said during the Spanish colonial period “our
forefathers in the Cordillera have always fought for freedom to protect and
govern the land that is their own. Rich in culture and tradition, as well as
natural resources: the preservation of these wealth has always been the
foremost reason for the fight for self-determination and Cordillera autonomy.”
Domondon said indigenous peoples of the Cordillera have
practiced forms of self-determination and self-rule for generations.
Domondon cited ethnic practices, such as the bodong,
pechen, and tungtongan, which are similar to today’s institutionalized
Katarungan Pambarangay.
He added that the Katarungan Pambarangay is basically a
copycat of what has been practiced by the various tribes of the Cordillera.
Dumaguing of Ifugao said many indigenous and sustainable practices can be institutionalized in an Autonomous Region of the Cordillera such as the Ifugao forest management system of Muyong.
Dumaguing of Ifugao said many indigenous and sustainable practices can be institutionalized in an Autonomous Region of the Cordillera such as the Ifugao forest management system of Muyong.
He said Cordillera autonomy was enshrined in the 1987
Constitution to promote social justice in exchange for the years of resource
exploitation and developmental neglect experienced by the people of Muslim
Mindanao and the Cordillera.
On defining a Cordilleran, Dumaguing said that the proposed
organic law would not exclude non-indigenous Cordillerans.
Versions of the proposed Cordillera Organic Law, he added,
define the Cordilleran as someone who is domiciled in the region.
Recently, however, members of the Organic Law drafting
committee have clarified that indigenous peoples of the Cordillera shall retain
their rights under the Indigenous Peoples’ Rights Act to include the five
pillars of ancestral domain, self-governance and empowerment, tribal justice
systems and human rights, cultural integrity, and entry into agreements and
peace pacts.
The police officers responded by voting a majority “yes”
during the mock plebiscite for Cordillera autonomy.
To show her support for the advocacy, one police officer
said that “we should not rely on the organizers to raise awareness on
Cordillera autonomy since we ourselves are already aware of this”.
The RDC through NEDA-Cordillera engages partners in both
the private and government sectors to raise awareness and gain support for
Cordillera autonomy.
RDC officials said
considering the region’s unique traditions and geography, autonomy as the best
approach to achieving sustainable development in the Cordillera region as
envisioned in the Philippine Development Plan.
No comments:
Post a Comment