PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
Perry Diaz
President
Barack Obama must be elated that in a matter of days, he had played host to two
of the world’s most powerful leaders. Arriving within days of each other, Pope
Francis, the spiritual leader and symbolic head of the world’s 1.2 billion
Roman Catholics, and President Xi Jinping, the supreme leader of China’s 1.3
billion people, crisscrossed the U.S. in a mission of goodwill.
Pope Francis’ visit to the U.S. was his
first. He was also the first Pope to address a joint session of Congress, an
occasion that was significant only because he touched on a sensitive issue that
has been rocking America’s political establishment – immigration. He reminded
his audience that we should not be fearful of foreigners. “We, the people of
this continent, are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once
foreigners,” he said. “I say this to you as the son of immigrants, knowing that
so many of you are also descended from immigrants.” Being the son of
immigrants, his comments were a testament to his family’s search for a better
life. His father’s family left Italy in 1929 to escape the fascist regime of
Benito Mussolini. They found it in Argentina.
Born on December 17, 1936 in Buenos Aires,
Jorge Mario Bergoglio was the eldest of five children of Mario José Bergoglio
and his wife Regina María Sívori, who is a daughter of Italian immigrants.
Little did they know that their son Jorge would someday become Pope.
After Pope Francis’ address to Congress,
Speaker John Boehner – who was once an altar boy – invited him to have dinner
with him and other congressional leaders. The Pope politely declined the
invitation, saying that he has a date with the homeless; he would be serving
them meals at St. Patrick’s Church in Washington, DC.
Ground Zero
After his meeting with Obama at the White
House, where they discussed climate change, Pope Francis left for New York City
where a hectic schedule awaited him. He addressed the United Nations General
Assembly and then went to the Ground Zero Memorial where he prayed for the
victims of 9/11. In a few words of wisdom, he encapsulated the events of 9/11
into the human psyche, saying: “This place of death became a place of life too,
a place of saved lives, a hymn to the triumph of life over the prophets of
destruction and death, to goodness over evil, to reconciliation and unity over
hatred and division.”
Trade violations
Meanwhile, Chinese President Xi Jinping –
called “Xi Dada” or “Big Daddy Xi” by his people – was busy meeting business
people across the U.S. On his first stop in Seattle, Washington State, Xi
impressed the media when it was announced that China was buying 300 commercial
airplanes from Boeing worth $38 billion. However, the deal includes a plan to
build a 737 completion center in China that generated protests from Boeing’s labor
union. The planned completion center — installing interiors, painting, and
delivering the planes – would mean closing the plants in Renton, North Carolina
and at the Boeing Field in Everett, Washington, and moving the jobs to China.
Trade experts believe that the controversial deal violates the Agreement on
Trade in Civil Aircraft, which is a “side agreement” among member-countries of
the World Trade Organization (WTO).
No compromise
Speaking at a joint press conference with Xi
on September 25, Obama reiterated concerns about China’s reclamation,
construction, and militarization of disputed islands in the South China Sea
(SCS), Xi responded in no uncertain terms: “Islands in the South China Sea,
since ancient times, are China’s territory. We have the right to uphold our own
territorial sovereignty and lawful and legitimate maritime rights and
interests.” He added, “Relevant construction activity that China is undertaking
in the Nansha Islands [Spratly Islands] does not target or impact any country
and there is no intention to militarize.”
With those words, Xi made it crystal clear
that the SCS is Chinese property and that it’s not negotiable. With a “no
compromise” stand on territorial ownership of the SCS, Xi appears to be telling
Obama, “If you go to war against us, we will annihilate America.” He made his
point clear last September 3 when in celebrating the 70th anniversary of
Japan’s defeat in World War II, Xi paraded China’s military might that included
seven new types of offensive missiles, two of which were labeled in plain
English, “Carrier Killer” and “Guam Killer.”
Raising the ante
On September 24 – on the eve of the Obama-Xi
summit meeting at the White House – it was reported in the news that China is
launching a new ballistic missile submarine that could potentially target any
part of the U.S. by the end of 2015. Further, the report said, “The Jin-class
submarines will be armed with the new JL-2 ballistic missile. This missile has
a range of 4,000 nautical miles, which would allow the submarine target Hawaii,
Alaska, and portions of the west coast of the US from the waters off of East
Asia.”
And instead of softening his hard-line stand
on the South China Sea disputes — which is a common courtesy in the world of
high-level diplomacy – Xi raised the ante on the eve of his state visit when
Chinese authorities arrested an American citizen, Phan Phan-Gillis, for spying.
She was part of a business delegation from Houston when she was detained six
months ago. Her husband, Jeff Gillis, told the New York Times, “It is the most
stupid politics in the world to arrest a U.S. citizen the week that Xi Jinping
is coming to the United States for a state visit on political charges of
spying.”
Good vs. evil
It is evident that Pope Francis and Xi
Jinping’s visits to America have made contrasting impressions on the American
people. On one hand, Papa Francisco had a profound impact on America as
Americans of various religious beliefs and political persuasions had embraced
the Pope’s message of peace and love. Indeed, Papa Francisco’s visit had
brought together a people beset with seemingly insurmountable problems facing
them: from immigration to the sanctity of life, from the plight of the poor to
social justice.
On the other hand, Xi Dada brought a message
of mixed signals that created an atmosphere of mistrust and belligerence.
Instead of bridging the gap that separates the world’s leading democracy and
communist China’s godless society that values authoritarian elitism at the
expense of human rights, Xi’s visit demonstrated that world peace is like a
star – you see it glow in your eyes but far too distant to reach. It’s just a
dream but Papa Francisco had made us believe that peace can be achieved through
faith while Xi Dada tried to convince the world that universal peace can only
be achieved with the economic, cultural, and existential destruction of
America.
No comments:
Post a Comment