By
Dexter A. See
This, after the
17th Division of the Court of Appeals upheld the legality and
constitutionality of Ordinance No. 043, series of 2007 or the city’s
anti-batching plant ordinance overruling the decision of a lower court that
declared the said local legislative measure as flawed.
In a 31-page decision
signed by Associate Justices Ramon A. Cruz, Marlene Gonzales-Sison and Henri
Lean Paul B. Inting, the CA cited there being a mixture of questions of facts
and of law, the local government correctly instituted its appeal.
The decision added the
assailed ordinance was passed by the City Council in the exercise of its police
power, an enactment of the local legislative body acting as agent of Congress
and local government units, as agencies of the State, are endowed with police
power to effectively accomplish and carry out the declared objects of their
creation and they exercise police power through their respective legislative
bodies.
It stated the Local
Government Code of 1991 empowered the local legislative bodies to enact
ordinances, approve resolutions and appropriate funds for the general welfare
of the city and its inhabitants and the proper exercise of the corporate powers
of the city.
The decision pointed
out the said rule is that every statute is presumed valid and on the party
challenging its validity weighs heavily the onerous task of rebutting the said
presumption and a reasonable doubt about the validity of the law should be resolved
in favor of its constitutionality.
“Every court is
charged with the duty of a purposeful hesitation before declaring a law
unconstitutional, on the theory that the measure was first carefully studied by
the executive and the legislative departments and determined by them to be in
accordance with the fundamental law before it was finally approved. The
presumption of constitutionality can be overcome by the clearest showing that
there was indeed an infraction of the Constitution, and only when such a conclusion
is reached by the required majority may the court pronounce, in the discharge
of the duty it cannot escape, that the challenged act must be struck down,” the
decision stated.
The decision found out
that it is necessary for both parties to present evidence to settle the factual
issues of the case that the operation of the batching plant is an environmental
hazard and that the destruction of the environment has continued at an
increasing and alarming rate and the CA recognized the necessity to curb the
same and the objective of the City Council to protect the tourism industry of
the city as well as the health of its people and a healthful ecology, is
commendable as long as it does not contravene the Constitution.
While the city can
regulate the operation of batching plants to ensure their compliance with
environmental laws, not even under the guise of police power, the CA stipulated
Ordinance No. 043, series of 2007 was enacted within the limits of the
Constitution, as there was no absolute prohibition against all batching plants,
but only those that are inimical to a balanced and healthful ecology.
However, the CA noted
the local government must show that the owner of the Camp 7 batching plant
violated the said ordinance justifying the issuance of the closure order being
questioned.
The case was remanded
to the local court for the conduct of a full blown hearing regarding
violations.
Domogan followed
recommendation of city building official Engr. Nazita Bañez to use the
violations of the batching plant to cancel the Environmental Compliance
Certificate (ECC) issued by the Cordillera office of the Environmental
Management Bureau (EMB-CAR) which is allegedly being used by the operator as a
legal justification for its continuous operation.
“We believe the
local government has sufficient legal bases to close the operation of the Camp
7 batching plant because of our existing zoning ordinance that declared the
area as residential area and the city’s Environment Code which provides the
guidelines operating environmentally critical projects,” Domogan said.
No comments:
Post a Comment