PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
During President Rodrigo Duterte’s last
State of the Union Address (SONA) on July 27, 2020, he told Congress that he
had no power to enforce the Philippines’ ownership of territories claimed by
China in the South China Sea. That was just two weeks after his
foreign and defense secretaries backed the U.S. Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo’s position accusing China of bullying Southeast Asian countries.
Now, Duterte
is saying he cannot go to war against Beijing over the disputed South China
Sea, calling himself “inutile.” Instead, he suggested that we better
just call off and treat this with “diplomatic endeavors.”
First all, I
don’t know where Duterte got the idea that disagreeing with China would lead to
war? In today’s geopolitical realities, war is the last option; that
is, if diplomacy fails.
Sure there
are posturing among opposing countries but in the final analysis the parties
end up talking diplomatically on issues confronting them. Nobody is
going to start shooting, not in today’s fast-track negotiating protocol.
But the
problem is that Duterte is operating “under the gun” after he surrendered the
Philippines’ sovereignty over the Scarborough Shoal in 2012. Since
then, China had the upper hand after she cordoned off the entrance to the
Scarborough Shoal.
China could
have taken full control of the shoal but U.S. President Barack Obama drew a red
line over the contested shoal in 2016, warning Chinese President Xi Jinping of
“serious consequences” if China reclaimed Scarborough Shoal.
A meeting was
held in Washington DC where Obama raised the stakes with Xi after U.S.
intelligence concluded that China was moving towards reclaiming land at the
shoal where Chinese and Philippine ships were engaged in a high-stakes
confrontation in 2012. Obama made crystal clear the US interests at
stake and the risk of military escalation. China backed off.
Following the
meeting in Washington, China withdrew her ships from the area, which gave the
White House a victory that some officials saw as vindication for a tougher approach
than over the previous three years when it failed to force China to curb its
controversial activities in the South China Sea.
But make no
mistake China never set her eyes off Scarborough Shoal. It’s always
been China’s primary target in the South China Sea. Militarization
of Scarborough Shoal has always been Beijing’s number one priority.
Scarborough
Shoal militarization
China needs
to militarize Scarborough Shoal to establish a strong springboard in its
attempt to penetrate the Luzon Strait, the gateway to the Western Pacific and
the Second Island Chain from Japan down to Guam to the Marshall Islands to
Papua New Guinea. And beyond the Second Island Chain is the vast
Pacific Ocean all the way to the continental U.S.
By building
air and naval bases on Scarborough Shoal, China will achieve a “Strategic
Triangle” that comprises Scarborough Shoal, Paracel Islands, and Spratly
Islands. China can then declare an Air Defense Identification Zone
(ADIZ) over the Strategic Triangle. That would complete China’s
military takeover and control over the entire South China
Sea. The question is: Is China going to cross the
red line that the U.S. drew over Scarborough Shoal during Obama’s
presidency? There is only one way to find out: cross the red
line. Would Xi cross it? Hmm…
And this is
where the U.S. and her allies should be vigilant about: to make sure that China
will not build an air and naval base on Scarborough Shoal. It will
take two years to build bases on Scarborough Shoal. At the first
sign of Chinese military activity on Scarborough Shoal, the U.S. should – nay,
must – act right away. And when that happens, there is no turning
back.
Pompeo commitment
Last March,
Pompeo, standing next to Locsin during a press conference in Manila confirmed,
for the very first time and at the highest diplomatic level that the
U.S.-Philippine Mutual Defense Treaty (MDT) specifically applies to the South
China Sea.
“As the South
China Sea is part of the Pacific, any armed attack on any Philippine forces,
aircraft, or public vessels in the South China Sea will trigger mutual defense
treaty obligations under Article 4 of our Mutual Defense Treaty,” he said,
reminding his hosts “We have your back.”
On July 13,
Pompeo issued a statement outlining the “U.S. Position on Maritime Claims in
the South China Sea.” Pompeo’s statement coincides with the fourth
anniversary of a landmark decision by the U.N. Arbitral Tribunal vindicating
claims brought by the Philippines against China under the U.N. Convention on the
Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Pompeo’s announcement explicitly aligns the
U.S. with the UNCLOS tribunal ruling, which declares that China’s expansive
claims to offshore resources across most of the South China Sea are “completely
unlawful” including China’s nine-dash line.
Pompeo’s
statement is the first instance in which the U.S. government has publicly
endorsed the merits of the 2016 UNCLOS tribunal decision on the status of
certain features in the Spratly Islands and related maritime
entitlements. However, the decision did not address underlying
sovereignty claims.
There you go,
plain and simple, the U.S. is committed to defending Philippine interests in
the Scarborough Shoal. If China attacks Philippine forces anywhere in the South
China Sea – including Scarborough Shoal – the U.S. will come to the
Philippines’ defense. So, what is Duterte’s problem?
Duterte’s problem
I think his
problem is that he doesn’t want to admit that he can invoke the MDT, which
would trigger the U.S. to come to the defense of the Philippines. Just
imagine the full force of the U.S. armed forces in the Far East pitted against
China – awesome! If war erupts as a result, it will be over before
the day ends. But Duterte doesn’t want to antagonize Xi for reasons
unknown. Is there a commission involved in the $26 billion
Chinese infrastructure projects that Xi promised Duterte? That’s a
lot of moolah!
It’s
interesting to note that Defense Secretary Delfin Lorenzana and Foreign Affairs
Secretary Teodoro Locsin Jr. are both staunch supporters of a strong
US-Philippines alliance. They played a central role in Duterte’s
U-turn on abrogation of the U.S.-Philippine Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) in
June.
So, why is
Duterte worried about going to war with China? As retired Supreme
Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio said in reaction to Duterte’s
SONA, “A country does not need to go to war to assert its sovereign rights.
There are
lawful and peaceful means of asserting sovereign rights. He noted that other
countries like Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia have been doing their part in
their respective maritime zones. “War is not even option because the
UN (United Nations) Charter outlaws resort to war to settle territorial or
maritime disputes,” he added.
President
Duterte shouldn’t be worried at the prospect of war with China. He
has the full force of the United States behind him. And should China
decide to attack the Philippines, it would end even before it started. (PerryDiaz@gmail.com)
No comments:
Post a Comment