Arrogant drivers / Baguio La Trinidad coding lifted
>> Sunday, March 31, 2013
BEHIND
THE SCENES
Alfred
P. Dizon
BAGUIO CITY – Drivers,
particularly those of public utility vehicles should be taught to respect
pedestrians particularly along zebra lines.
Not only that, PUJ
drivers must also be taught that ramming one’s vehicle on a pedestrian lane is
not a video game where one can play with lives of people.
How often have I seen
power tripping drivers, particularly those of taxis and passenger jeeps who
don’t stop or brake when approaching pedestrian lanes.
One time, I saw an old
lady who was nearly sideswiped by a speeding taxi along Session Road. When
somebody shouted at the driver, he even had the temerity to stick the dirty
finger in the air with an arrogant smile. I regret I was not able to get the
plate number.
Maybe, the driver was
high on shabu. I have have been told by many sources that most taxi drivers use
the illegal drug to make them stay awake even if they drive nonstop day and
night. The police and narcotics agents could look into this as I am told, one
of the distribution areas is somewhere along Crystal Cave.
Lest we stray, there
are also PUJ drivers who stop in the middle of the road to pick passengers.
There are also the irresponsible, arrogant and drunk drivers who are a menace
on the road.
One time, while
driving around 11 p.m. at the intersection near the La Trinidad public market
in Benguet, I was nearly sideswiped by a speeding pickup truck who cut me from
the right lane, passed in front of me, went to the left, then disappeared on
the road to Pico. If I didn’t brake hard, a collision could have occurred.
There are a lot of
horror stories about these stupid drivers. Suffice to say, I read about a
proposed ordinance in San Juan, Metro Manila which may catch on with other cities
or towns in making the streets safer.
Authored by Councilor
Angelo Agcaoili, drivers sternly will be penalized for not stopping to let
pedestrians cross the zebra lanes. Over the past decades, uncouth drivers
acting like kings of the road have been endangering pedestrians, the proposed
law said.
Countless walkers have
been killed or maimed when hit by vehicles while crossing the street — even in
designated crosswalks, under heavy rains, it noted.
Agcaoili, a lawyer,
has had enough of it. His bill would compel drivers to brake even if only one
person is crossing the zebra lane. Violators will be fined P1,000 for the first
and P2,000 for subsequent offenses. The driver’s license will be confiscated,
and one-percent interest per month shall be tacked on, until the fine is paid.
Exceptions shall only
be when the pedestrian is crossing the street not at the corner or zebra lane,
and when the vehicle has a go-signal from the traffic light or officer. That
should caution against jaywalking as well.
However, there already
is a national law to enforce pedestrian crosswalks. And as with all national
legislations, it jealously disallows municipal superseding.
Presidential Decree
No. 1958, issued in 1984, amends the Land Transportation and Traffic Code of 1964.
Aside from its primary aim of imposing a private motor vehicle tax, PD 1958
obliges motorists to give way to pedestrians.
Chapter IV, Traffic
Rules, Article III, Right of Way and Signals, Section 42(c) states: “The driver
of any vehicle upon a highway within a business or residential district shall
yield the right of way to a pedestrian crossing such highway within a
crosswalk, except at intersections where the movement of traffic is being
regulated by a peace officer or by traffic signal. Every pedestrian crossing a
highway within a business or residential district, at any point other than a
crosswalk, shall yield the right of way to vehicles upon the highway.”
Chapter V, Penal and
Other Provisions, Article I, Penalties, Section 56(l) fines violators —
reckless drivers and jaywalkers alike — P100 to P500. Section 56(m) metes
commensurate imprisonment on those who cannot pay. Section 56(n) further
punishes under the Revised Penal Code the driver whose ignoring of the zebra
lane results in death or injury.
And the breaker:
Article III, Final Provisions, Section 62: “No provincial board, city or
municipal council shall enact or enforce any ordinance or resolution in
conflict with the provisions of this Act, or prohibiting any deputy or agent of
the (Land Transportation) Commission to enforce this Act within their
respective territorial jurisdiction and the provisions of any charter to the
contrary notwithstanding.”
There is need for the
road culture change that Agcaoili envisions other than a new traffic ordinance.
Surely there are many
other city and municipal councilors who think the same. Through their national
association, they can prod their colleagues to allot funds to paint zebra lanes
in their locales. They can fund reeducation of their driver-constituents in
traffic rules and road courtesy, especially in basic respect for pedestrians.
They can build more
jails for reckless drivers and jaywalkers. And they can pass stiff ordinances
to fine drivers who wreck public facilities like sidewalks and medians,
hydrants, lampposts, traffic lights and signs.
They can lobby
Congress to increase the fines and penalties for traffic violations. Lobby the
Land Transportation Office too to impose stricter driver’s licensing, drug and
emissions checks.
They can make the LTO
require all drivers to buy copies of the Land Transportation and Traffic Code
and the amending PD 1958. All drivers must be tested on the provisions.
If these stupid
drivers can’t still be stopped from playing their dangerous driving games, concerned
citizens or groups should lobby to change police chiefs or local officials who
don’t have the political will to enforce road laws to have these nincompoops
arrested.
***
Supt. Davy
Vicente M. Limmong, chief of the Cordillera regional police information office
sent an advisory saying vehicle number coding schemes in La Trinidad,
Benguet and nearby Baguio City were lifted starting March 18 to April 12 for
private vehicles only on occasion of the La Trinidad Strawberry Festival.
Editorial
‘No
permit, no exam’ policy a violation of right to education’
The suicide of
University of the Philippines Manila freshman Kristel Tejada, the 16-year-old behavioral science student who
drank silver cleaning solution on March 15 at their house in Tondo, Manila after she was reportedly forced to take a
leave of absence for failing to pay tuition has put to scrutiny the pathetic
state of the educational system of the country.
Some top national
officials have tried to improve the system but then, for one reason or another,
their endeavors have been put to waste.
One of the proponents
to improve the educational system was Sen. Manuel Villar who said the “no
permit, no exam policy” goes against the right to education.
Villar said had his proposal, Senate Bill 2992
or the “Anti- No Permit, No Exam Act” been passed and made into a law, it could
have restrained UP from preventing Tejada from continuing her studies due to
lack of funds.
Villar said he filed
SB 2992 on Oct. 11, 2011 but it was not approved during the current Congress.
“We have said it before, the ‘No Permit, No Exam’ policy of some schools is not
just. It is a constraint on our children’s right to education,” Villar said.
The Senate bill’s
counterpart measure passed third reading in the House of Representatives on
Aug. 3, 2011. His son, Las Piñas Rep. Mark Villar, is among its authors.
The proposal seeks to
allow students with dues, unpaid tuition and other school fees to take the
midterm or final examination. Students should not be required to secure from
school authorities a permit before being allowed to take the midterm or final
examination.
The proposal also
prevents schools from requiring the payment, upon enrollment, of a down payment
or first installment of more than 30 percent of the total amount of the tuition
and other school fees for the entire semester or duration of the course.
Villar said he would
ask his wife Cynthia to pursue the passage of the measure if she wins her
senatorial bid this May.
Sen. Francis Escudero
said he would seek an inquiry into the UP system to find out if the state-owned
university has been serving its mandated purpose of providing accessible
education to deserving students.
“Equal access to
education is one of my advocacies. And being a product of the UP myself, I
sympathize with those who are unable to afford college tuition even with
subsidies provided by the state university,” Escudero said.
Sen. Loren Legarda
called on state universities and colleges to review their respective policies
on providing opportunities to students who want to study, but are unable to do
so due to lack of financial support.
Tejada was forced to
take a leave of absence because she could not pay her tuition balance of
P10,000 this semester.
She had asked for a
loan or installment payment and offered a promissory note. Tejada was forced to
file a forced leave of absence (LOA) after UP Manila disallowed her from
attending her classes.
Then on that early
Friday, Tejada took her own life. As a consequence, UP president Alfredo Pascual
said he planned to revise the state
university’s tuition and financial assistance scheme.
He said there is a
need to revise the plan due to problems like the long application process.
Pascual said apart
from the centralized process of classifying the students under the scheme,
there are delays in decisions on the bracketing scheme to determine the
financial capability of each scholar. He also cited the mismatch between
the indicators and the actual financial needs of the students.
Pascual said there was
need to increase the allowance for those classified under the lowest
bracket. Among the proposed changes is the integration of the income
information in the application to take the UP College Admission Test.
He said there is also
a proposal to do home visits to verify the financial standing by random
sampling, warning of a penalty for misdeclaration.
“Too late the hero”
may aptly describe actions of UP officials whose resignations are being
demanded by students and an outraged citizenry.
Tejada’s death may
have also served another purpose -- for the citizenry to vote they May for
officials particularly in the national level who are intent in making education
more accessible to everyone particularly to the poor and marginalized calls.
0 comments:
Post a Comment