The Baan Story
>> Tuesday, October 6, 2015
LETTERS FROM THE AGNO
March Fianza
Some
65 years ago today, two Nueva Vizcaya towns are still stuck in a boundary row
as residents of one barangay called Baan are puzzled as to which town do they
“belong” to. Why such case is up and unresolved is a question that crops up
everytime real property owners go to pay their taxes.
Under EO 368, the
juridical boundaries and common boundaries straddled by two neighboring
municipalities were identified. For example, in the case of Kayapa and Aritao,
their common boundaries are the Imugan and Sta. Cruz Rivers. That fact is
confirmed in the website of the Province of Nueva Vizcaya and the Municipality
of Kayapa.
For Barangay Baan
residents who are not aware of EO 368, the answer to how the confusion arose is
a wild guess. Some say they belong to Baan under this town because that is
where they pay their taxes and the town’s market is where they go to buy
goodies.
On the other hand,
other residents say they pay their taxes in that town because that is where
they were told to apply for tax declarations over the lands that they occupied.
According to
information divulged by those in the know, taxpayers were, in the first place,
misled into obeying the instruction of “wise and knowledgeable” politicians,
property assessors and government employees.
At least, this
confusion tells us two things: that one of these towns is collecting taxes way
up and above what it should be collecting. It is good if the taxes collected go
to the coffers of the town, and not to the pockets of those who run the town.
The other thing that the confusion tells us is that one of these towns is being
cheated in terms of tax collections that it is not getting.
On either case, it
runs counter to EO 368 that has defined 65 years ago the boundaries of all
towns in Nueva Vizcaya. It also cheats people of their taxes in connection with
the internal revenue allotment or IRA that the towns and barangays receive.
In addition, there is
need to inquire if Barangay Baan receives its correct share of financial
support from the upper LGUs, or if its share is doubled since it “exists”
either under Kayapa or Aritao.
During a medical
mission to Sitio Domolpos, Barangay Tinongdan, Itogon, Benguet in 2002, I was
told that another sitio called Ansipsip is a barangay listed under Kayapa in
Nueva Vizcaya. Then another story I heard was that Lawigen which is a sitio
under Barangay Dalupirip, Itogon, Benguet is a barangay unit of Kayapa, Nueva
Vizcaya.
The reason behind all
of these is dishonesty and money. LGUs expand their areas and declare wrong
population figures, as these are the basis for the IRA share from the national
government. Government officials cannot be blamed for this. And it is widely the
case in many other places in the country.
0 comments:
Post a Comment