Why Cayetano is opposing Sarmiento’s CJ nomination
>> Monday, July 30, 2012
BEHIND THE SCENES
Alfred P. Dizon
We
received an e-mail from Senate Minority Leader Alan Peter Cayetano’s office
explaining why he was opposing the nomination of Commission on Elections Commissioner Rene Sarmiento as Chief Justice.
According
to Cayetano, Sarmiento “allowed if not abetted,” the perpetration of fraud in
the 2007 and 2010 elections.”
Cayetano
had written a letter to the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) saying, “We have
just undergone the painful impeachment of the head of the judiciary. What the
judiciary needs now is a CJ who will not only heal the wounds of impeachment,
but, more importantly, restore the people’s faith and confidence in the Supreme
Court. We cannot afford to commit another mistake in the appointment of a CJ.
We cannot appoint somebody like Commissioner Sarmiento whose competence,
integrity, probity, and independence are not beyond suspicion.”
Cayetano
accused Sarmiento and other members of the Comelec of not deciding with dispatch
his nuisance candidate complaint against one JoselitoPepitoCayetano in the 2007
senatorial elections, leading to confusion among voters and the sabotaging of
his chances of winning.
The
senator said the Comelec only disqualified JoselitoPepito three days before the
election and, worse, declared on election day that since their decision was not
yet final and executory, any vote for “Cayetano” would not be counted in his
(Alan Peter’s) favor.
“Furthermore,
in an unprecedented move, both Cemelecand the Department of Education launched
a campaign to call schools and Board of Election Inspectors members to order
them not to count 'Cayetano' votes in my favor,” Cayetano told the JBC.
This
was reportedly happening while the former First Gentleman Mike Arroyo was
openly campaigning against him and telling politicians that he should not win
at all cost, said the senator.
The
former First Gentleman is the husband of former President Gloria
Macapagal-Arroyo, who appointed Commissioner Sarmiento.Cayetano pointed out
that the decision only accomplished what the handlers of Joselito Pepito sought
to do, which was to sow confusion among the electorate.
“Many
voters thought that JoselitoPepito had already been disqualified so they just
wrote ‘Cayetano’ on the ballots to vote for me. Millions of these votes were
considered stray by order of the Comelec, resulting in substantial reduction of
my total votes,” the senator said.
Cayetano
said Sarmiento did not protest this “machination” and that “no angry denunciation,
no stinging dissent – not even a whimper” was heard from the Comelec official.
“Later
on during the counting of the votes, he (Sarmiento) would also inexplicably
turn a blind eye to the statistically impossible results of zero (0) vote for
candidates Noynoy Aquino, Ping Lacson and myself in some areas.”
Cayetano
also charged Sarmiento, as one of those who took charge of the elections in
Mindanao in 2007, which resulted in the orchestrated defeat of then senatorial
candidate Koko Pimentel.
“During
an interview with a news anchor, Commissioner Sarmiento denied having in their
custody blank election returns. But when shown a video of Comelec personnel bringing into Maria Cristina
Hotel in Iligan City copies of blank election returns, Commissioner Sarmiento took back his denial and explained
that the blank election returns were brought to the hotel for safekeeping,” the
senator said.
“Witnesses
would later come out claiming that Commissioner Sarmiento was involved in the
grand conspiracy to rig the 2007 Senatorial election to try to defeat then
candidates Noynoy Aquino, Ping Lacson and myself,” he added.
And
despite the issues regarding the operations of the so-called “Garci Boys” in
the 2004 elections, Sarmiento has not stood up, initiated or moved for an
investigation of said individuals. In fact, instead of investigating and
punishing these people, many of the said “Garci Boys” were promoted, said
Cayetano.
“If
fraud can be perpetrated to a member of Congress, and in a much-publicized
case, imagine how it can be done easily to other citizens. Commissioner
Sarmiento had the obligation to uphold the integrity of the ballots and protect
the people’s will and not protect the machinations and schemes of powerful
traditional politicians,” the solon said.
Cayetano
added that even after the Senate started investigating the cheating in the 2004
and 2007 elections, where testimonies showed machinations of said “Garci Boys”,
Sarmiento did nothing.
“His
inclusion in the list of aspirants for the position of Chief Justice to the
Supreme Court may prove to be an embarrassment if I do not bring these events,
facts, and matters to the attention of the Honorable members of this Council. I
will be as guilty as Commissioner Sarmiento if I remain silent. While Commissioner
Sarmiento styles himself as an election reformist, his actions--and
inactions--show otherwise,” said Cayetano.
Sarmiento’s
actions and inactions were not only evident during the 2007 and 2010 elections,
but even in his voting record, which is far from exemplary, said Cayetano,
citing Nila G. Aguillo v. Isidro L. Hemedes, Jr. and Benjamin C.
Del Rosario v. Rommel A. Gecolea.
“The
above-described conduct of Commissioner Sarmiento in the performance of his
duties as a high ranking official of the Comelecputs under heavy cloud of doubt
his integrity, impartiality and propriety, which are all required from a member
of the judiciary, much more from the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
“All
of the above-mentioned events, facts and matters can be easily verified as they
are of public knowledge and borne out by public and official records. Moreover,
since most of these were reported in the national media, a simple search in the
internet will show the factual background of my statements.
Under
the rules, the JBC may conduct a discreet investigation with Cayetano
expressing readiness to “provide more information and assist in any way to get
the truth, the whole truth.”
0 comments:
Post a Comment