Possible economic impacts of falling oil prices, pandemic and looming global recession onto overseas Filipinos and their remittances
>> Thursday, April 16, 2020
ANALYSIS
By Alvin
P. Ang (Ateneo de Manila University) and Jeremaiah
Opiniano (University of Santo Tomas)
The
COVID-19 pandemic may well be the most challenging crisis facing the migration
management system of the Philippines. The global dispersion of overseas
Filipinos (estimated to be at least 10.3 million, in over-200 countries and
territories) meets up with the global spread of the viral disease. Both the
countries receiving overseas migrants and migrant-origin countries like the
Philippines are now trying to survive, unleashing stimulus packages or rescue
funds to meet the needs of their citizens.
Remittance
flows from abroad are literally a major economic lifeline. This lifeline will
then backstop whatever public funds the Philippine government is now unloading
to meet urgent survival and social protection needs of Filipinos. The scale of
Filipino households who continually receive foreign remittances? Around 12
percent of all Filipino households “have or had an OFW [overseas Filipino
worker] member,” says the 2018 National Migration Survey (NMS).
With
much of the global economy in a lockdown, many OFWs are unable to report for
work and, at the same time, are unable to send money back home more
frequently. In addition, declining oil prices in the past few weeks are a
corollary challenge, threatening the stability of OFWs in the Middle East.
OFWs
sent about US$ 30.13 billion in cash remittances in 2019, higher than the US$
28.94 billion sent in 2018. The 2018 Survey on Overseas Filipinos[1] (SOF) says
there are about 2.3 million Filipino migrant workers. Meanwhile, stock
estimates on overseas Filipinos (latest: 2013) disaggregates Filipinos overseas
as follows: 4.2 million as temporary migrants (migrant workers), 4.8 million as
permanent migrants, and 1.2 million as irregular migrants.
During the 2008-09
global financial crisis, the presence of OFWs in many parts of the world has
spread the risk of slow levels of total remittance inflows to the
Philippines.
However,
COVID-19’s spread has now reached literally the entire planet. As of April 2,
over-940,000 people have been infected with COVID-19 (including some Filipino
migrant workers, permanent residents and naturalized citizens).
Also, during the
2008-2009 crisis, oil prices did not go down to its present level —about US$ 22
per barrel.
The
impacts of the 2008-2009 crisis on OFWs were not as severe as initially
anticipated. Many OFWs remained in their working countries, adjusting their
statuses there by deskilling (e.g. an engineer laid off, continued to work as
an electrician) and by coping and riding through the short-term impacts of that
crisis. Workers were still physically mobile at that time.
In
the current scenario, many countries are on lockdown and all the oil producers
in the Middle East (where nearly half of our OFWs are based) are at risk with
falling oil prices. If this price trend continues, the Middle East might be
forced to stop oil production and possibly lay off many workers —including
Filipinos.
With
the combined impacts of the global economic stoppage, lockdowns and declining
oil prices, base-to-worst case scenarios could lead to:
a) Cash
remittances potentially declining
from US$ 30 billion in 2019 to US$ 27 billion (base case) to US$24 billion
(worst case). That is roughly 10-to-20% or US$3 to US$6 billion
less, year on year —this to become steepest drop of remittance inflows in
Philippine migration history; and
b) About 300,00 to 400,000 OFWs being
affected by lay-offs and pay cuts, not to mention that some of them may need to
be repatriated.
Note
also that in 2019, at least 121 countries and territories where Filipinos are
sent lesser remittance amounts than in 2018. The total lesser remittance
amounts from these 121 jurisdictions was US$ 1.36 billion.
These
base-to-worst case scenarios are significant numbers hitting the economy
externally and then internally. With overseas Filipinos’ remittances fueling
national consumption, we can lose 20 to 40 percent of consumption due to the
pass-through effect of remittances.
Some things that can be
done now:
Labor
and foreign officials may have to start monitoring and informing the public how
many overseas Filipinos will be displaced from their jobs —similar to efforts
done during the 2008-2009 global economic crisis.
Embassies
and consulates have to anticipate and monitor expected job displacements
affecting Filipinos. Diplomatic officials should also be given leeway to
negotiate with ministries of labor possible steps to keep foreign workers and,
to the extent possible, include them in their countries’ social protection
programs.
Globally-mapped
information on these arrangements must be tracked. That way, these resources
from host countries will give overseas Filipinos and their families some
wherewithal apart from
what migration and non-migration government agencies back home will be giving
(e.g. social amelioration program funds under the Bayanihan to Heal as One
Act). Resources coming from host countries will buy relevant Philippine
government agencies (e.g. Overseas Workers Welfare Administration [OWWA],
Social Security System [SSS], Philippine Health Insurance Corp. [PhilHealth])
some time.
Labor and
foreign officials may have to initiate dialogues with the International Labor
Organization (ILO) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) on
how to assist distressed migrant workers affected by the pandemic.
OWWA
may have to offer Metro Manila-based temporary shelters as 14-day quarantine
facilities for displaced returning OFWs.
Since
PhilHealth will be covering hospitalization expenses of COVID-19 cases, this
should also apply to COVID-19-infected returning overseas workers through
PhilHealth’s Overseas Workers Program (OWP).
The SSS and its OFW membership
program should allow OFW members to avail of the benefits of membership at this
critical juncture.
Prior to going overseas, OFWs are
compelled to pay accredited private insurance companies insurance premiums so
as to cover repatriation expenses. This arrangement must now be activated by
the private insurance companies concerned.
0 comments:
Post a Comment