John Hay lessee files case vs BCDA prexy
>> Monday, June 18, 2012
BAGUIO
CITY -- Executives of property developer Camp John Hay Development Corp here
Thursday lodged a perjury complaint against the president and chief executive
officer of the Bases Conversion and Development Authority.
The
perjury charge against BCDA president and chief executive officer, Arnel Paciano
Casanova stemmed from his alleged accusations that CJHDevCo officials used
false pretenses to deceive and induced the agency to enter into a “dacion en
pago” agreement on May 27, 2011, in order to settle its outstanding obligation
with BCDA.
"No
other conclusion can adduced from the foregoing circumstance except for the
reprehensible and ominous certainty that respondent willfully and deliberately
omitted facts in order to support a falsehood – the existence of the purported
double sale," CJHDevCo vice president for litigation Manuel Ubarra Jr.
said in a complaint-affidavit filed before the Manila City fiscal’s office.
The
CJHDevCo official accused Casanova of perjuring himself when he filed an estafa
complaint against officials of CJHDevCo before senior state prosecutor Philip
Kimpo at the Department of Justice last March.
Casanova
earlier claimed that BCDA was deceived and induced to enter into an Agreement
dated 27 May 2010 with CJHDevCo wherein the latter transferred to BCDA
ownership and possession of five log homes in Camp John Hay in exchange for the
condonation of its outstanding obligation with BCDA in the amount of
P36,801,499 due to the false pretenses of the CJHDevCo officers.
He said
the government agency would never have given its consent to and entered into
the Dacion en pago Agreement had it known that one of the log homes, Log Home
No. 9, had been previously sold in 1999 by CJHDevCo to another person
identified as Wilson Sy.
Ubarra, in
response to the statement of Casanova, denied the respondent’s malicious
accusation that CJHDevCo, through its officers, deceived and induced BCDA to
enter into dacion en pago.
He
explained that the first seller had rescinded his offer to buy the unit even
before the log cabin was "assigned" to the property developer.
0 comments:
Post a Comment