The re-emergence of NATO
>> Thursday, September 18, 2014
PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
Perry Diaz
After annexing Crimea
using masked men in military uniforms with no insignia, Putin found himself in
a tight spot when the U.S. and her western European allies imposed sanctions
against Russia. Denying what was obviously an invasion into
Ukrainian territory, Putin pretended to play the role of a “peacekeeper”
between the pro-western Ukrainian government and the pro-Russian separatists in
southeast Ukraine. But how can he achieve peace when Russian troops
masquerading as separatist Ukrainians using Russian heavy weapons are roaming
around shooting at Ukrainian government forces?
What
became apparent was that Putin in so many words had declared his intention to
assert Russian domination over Eastern Europe – or what he referred to as “near
abroad” – just like the days of the Soviet Union or, nostalgically, the
glorious era of the Czarist Russian Empire.
Putin
probably sees himself as the personification of Peter the Great, Czar Alexander
I, and Vladimir Lenin all rolled into one. Like Alexander I,
Putin was born in St. Petersburg, which was founded by Peter the
Great. Like Lenin, who was the leader of the bygone Soviet Union,
Putin is acting like the leader of a revival of the Imperial Russia of
Catherine the Great.
Czar
Alexander I is remembered in history as the one who defeated Napoleon by
burning Moscow to deny Napoleon the victory of his lifetime. With
Napoleon fleeing in retreat, Alexander said that the burning of Moscow had
“illuminated his soul”; and declared, “Napoleon or I: from now on we cannot
reign together!”
“Greater Novorossiya”
Today,
Putin is faced with the prospect of a reinvigorated North Atlantic Treaty
Organization (NATO), his old nemesis, which has now expanded to 28 countries
including 12 former Soviet client states. But Putin has nobody
to blame but himself for the revitalization of NATO as a force in the
geopolitical affairs of the western hemisphere. It is
interesting to note that for more than two decades after the dismemberment of
the Soviet Union, the acronym “NATO” took a new meaning: “No Action, Talk
Only.” Now, with Putin rearming Russia like never before, a repeat
of “Munich Appeasement” will not be allowed to happen again.
And when
Putin mentions “Novorossiya,” it sends shivers down the spines of leaders of
the “near abroad.” The term “Novorossiya” – New Russia -- is the
czarist-era name for Ukraine’s Russian-speaking southeast, which Putin is now
eyeing as his next conquest. But Putin’s sight goes beyond the
boundary of czarist Novorossiya. Recently, he has been using the term
“Greater Novorossiya,” which includes a wide swath of contiguous territory from
Russia’s western boundaries to the borders of Moldova and
Romania. This would give Russia total control of the land on the
northern shore of the Black Sea; thus, denying NATO access to the Black Sea by
land. Although, NATO warships can enter the Black Sea through the
Dardanelles Strait, which is controlled by NATO member Turkey, the Montreux
Convention of 1936 limits the stay of naval ships not belonging to Black Sea
states to 21 days. Control of the Black Sea then is crucial to
Putin’s expansion plans.
“PaxRussica”
In 2005,
Putin said that the collapse of the Soviet Union was a tragedy for
Russians. “First and foremost it is worth acknowledging that the demise of
the Soviet Union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the century,” he
said. It did not come as a surprise then that Putin had put Ukraine
in his crosshairs.
But Putin’s
incursion into Ukraine and his dream of a “Greater Novorossiya” came at a most
inopportune time: the biennial summit meeting of NATO. The summit,
held in Wales, brought together 60 world leaders, including NATO allies and
partners. This summit was arguably the most important assemblage of world
leaders since the founding of the United Nations in 1945 where representatives
from 51 countries signed the U.N. charter.
And what
made the NATO summit extremely significant was Putin’s predilection for
mimicking Hitler’s attempt to put Europe under his authoritarian
rule. This time around, Putin would impose his opportunistic and
imperialistic brand of world peace, “PaxRussica.”
Ceasefire
While
Ukraine’s new and dynamic president, billionaire-turned-politician Petro
Poroshenko, was making a strong pitch for NATO’s assistance to stop Putin’s
assault on Ukraine, he was also negotiating for a ceasefire with Putin by
phone. A ceasefire was agreed upon and the fighting stopped;
however, NATO leaders were skeptical about it. And true enough, less
than 24 hours after the ceasefire took hold, fighting renewed in the
government-held city of Mariupol, strategically located on the north coast of
the Sea of Azov.
If Mariupol
fell to the pro-Russian rebels, it would open up a corridor from Russia to
Crimea, which begs the question: Was this part of Putin’s grand design to
create “Greater Novorossiya”? As the Ukrainian Interior Minister
said, “Are you surprised that Putin is treacherous?”
But
treachery has always been the trademark of a KGB agent, which Putin once
was.
And
Poroshenko should know that; he didn’t make his billions playing patsy to
anyone. Should the ceasefire crumble and the fighting resume,
Poroshenko would be much better prepared for it. He said that
the U.S., France, Italy, Poland, and Norway would provide Ukraine with military
advisers and lethal weapons to defend Ukraine if Russia attacked.
“One for all, all for one”
But the
game-changer that came out of the summit was NATO’s decision to create a new
rapid response force to counter Russian aggression. It will
have headquarters in Eastern Europe and a “spearhead” force consisting between
4,000 and 5,000 troops who would be in place to respond to any crisis,
including Russian invasion, within 48 hours.
The reinvigoration of NATO from the doldrums of the post-Soviet Union
era is a healthy sign for the “near abroad” states that live in constant fear
of Russian aggression. With large populations of ethnic Russians and
Russian-speaking people, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are easy prey to
Russian invasion. But with U.S. President Barack Obama reminding
Putin that an “attack on one is an attack on all,” Putin should never in his
megalomaniacal moments ever think of invading a NATO country.
Indeed,
Putin’s Russia is no different from the evil empire of the defunct Soviet
Union. At the end of the day, the re-emergence of NATO bodes once
again that the good shall prevail over evil.
The ultimate question is: Would NATO allow
Russia to dismember Ukraine with the creation of “Greater
Novorossiya”? Time will tell. (PerryDiaz@gmail.com)
0 comments:
Post a Comment