The People’s Grace
>> Sunday, November 9, 2014
PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
Perry Diaz
It is customary for a
lot of people to say grace, a short prayer before eating a meal. The
most common grace among Catholics is: “Bless us, O Lord, and these, Thy
gifts, which we are about to receive from Thy bounty, through Christ, our Lord.
Amen.” But to a lot of people in the Philippines, which is
predominantly Catholic, saying grace is meaningless because they don’t have
food or not enough food on the table. That’s the kind of existence that
43% -- 9.3 million families – consider themselves “food-poor” from a recent
Social Weather Stations (SWS) survey.
The SWS
survey was what Sen. Grace Poe referenced when she delivered a privilege speech
on the Senate floor last October 27, 2014. She said that out of the 43 million
“food-poor” individuals, three million battled severe hunger, a condition she
said of being "always" or "often" hungry.
She
prefaced her speech: “October
16 was World Food Day. But for many Filipinos it was ‘no food day’ as
usual. That would be hard
to believe in a country getting glowing economic report cards and whose capital
is brightened by blinding billboards advertising all kinds of food. But the fact is millions of Filipinos
go to bed, go to work, or go to school hungry.”
Sen. Poe
also referenced the 8th National Nutrition Survey, which found that 7.36
million children below the age of five are malnourished. However, she said, “The Food and Agriculture
Organization or FAO gives a higher estimate -- 15 million or bigger than the
population of Metro Manila. UNICEF says globally, we rank 9th in the most
number of stunted kids.”
Indeed, for
a country that boasts of a robust economic growth – highest GDP growth forecast
among the Association of Southeast Asian Nations-6 (ASEAN-6) members for
2014-2015 -- during the presidency of President Benigno “P-Noy” Aquino III, the
hunger rate increased in the past two years. The SWS survey for the fourth quarter
of 2013 showed hunger at 18.1% of families. For the same period in 2012, hunger
was at 16.3% of families. It’s
sad to note that at a time of unprecedented economic growth, poverty went up in
large numbers. Where did
all that money go? Or could
it be that there was really no “economic growth” in spite of the country’s
impressive Gross Domestic Product (GDP); thus, defying commonly-accepted
economic truism?
Corruption
vs. poverty
This
reminds me of P-Noy’s campaign slogan, “Walangkorap,
walangmahirap,”which translates to “No corruption, no poverty.” If that equation were true, could it
also be correct to presume that if corruption increased, then poverty would
increase?
In my
article, “Rx for Poverty and
Corruption” (December 9, 2005), I wrote:“What is the cause of
corruption? Some people say that poverty is to blame for the ‘culture of
corruption.’ A veteran Philippine Senator once said, ‘Poverty breeds
corruption.’ Does it,
really? Or is it the other way around, ‘Corruption causes poverty’?
“A study made by Management
Systems International in Washington, DC, in 2003, has concluded: ‘Corruption
has direct consequences on economic and government factors, intermediaries that
in turn produce poverty.’ The study produced two models. On the one hand, the
‘economic model’ postulates that corruption affects poverty by first impacting
economic growth factors, which, in turn, impact poverty levels. In other words,
‘Increased corruption reduces economic growth which would increase poverty.’ On
the other hand, the ‘government model’ asserts that corruption affects poverty
by first influencing governance factors, which, in turn, impact poverty levels.
In other words, ‘Increased corruption reduces governance capacity which would
increase poverty.’
“Is it then fair to presume that increasing economic growth and increasing
government capacity would decrease poverty? If so, in order to eradicate
poverty, corruption should be dealt with in a fashion that would deter people —
particularly government officials — from practicing corruption. However, the
problem is: The Philippines does not have an effective deterrence to stop
corruption.”
Strong
leadership
So, what
does it take to have an “effective deterrence” to stop corruption? It sounds like a simple question but
that requires a complex answer. Or,
could it be that the answer is as simple as the question, which is “strong
leadership”?
History
tells us that a strong leader who is imbued with a fervent desire to change –
nay, revolutionize -- the way our government is being run, produces the best results. And
when I said “strong leader,” I’m not talking about the likes of Ferdinand
Marcos but in the mold of Ramon Magsaysay, Lee Kuan Yew, and Nelson
Mandela.
And looking
at the current crop of presidential wannabes who call themselves “leaders,” none
qualifies for the job. They’ll
just be the same as most of those who held – and abused -- power before them;
that is, corrupt to the core.
What the
country needs is a person untainted by corruption and who is committed to
eradicating poverty. Does
it sound like an impossible dream? Yes,
it does. Yet, there is
always hope. And sometimes
it comes in a strange way… a miracle. But
if we lose even a glimmer hope, and stop looking for the right person to lead
our nation, then the Philippines would be consigned to perdition.
Amazing
Grace
What we
need is a modern-day Joan of Arc. Who
I have in mind is Sen. Grace Poe, who stands out as someone who would galvanize
the people waiting for the leader to free them from the clutches of
poverty.
Many people
believe that Grace’s emergence from relative obscurity and rising to number one
position in the 2013 senatorial elections was providentially
inspired. Indeed, never in the history of Philippine politics had a
neophyte politician -- who never held an elected or appointed position in
government -- attracted the support of 10 million voters, one million votes
more than the attractive and experienced politician who placed second.
It is
interesting to note that Grace’s father, the late action hero Fernando Poe Jr.
(FPJ), garnered 11.7 million votes when he ran for president in 2004… and
lost. However, many believe that he would have won had his opponent, then
incumbent president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, did not cheat. Election experts averred that Arroyo
cheated Poe of at least one million votes using dagdag-bawas (vote-padding/vote-shaving system),
which would have been enough to offset Arroyo’s lead. It is expected that FPJ’s “command
votes” would go to his daughter if she runs.
With the
election still a year and half away, Grace is not expected to make known her
plans. Not yet. But as the election gets nearer, a
groundswell of support is expected to build up, which begs the question: Would there be a movement to draft
Grace for President? Personally,
I believe that a campaign to draft her would soon materialize and could easily
get at least a million signatures. And
riding high on the crest of popularity, Grace would be the people’s
candidate… the people’s
Grace, indeed. (PerryDiaz@gmail.com)
0 comments:
Post a Comment