Sagada Pidlisan tribe rejects CHARMP watershed project
>> Wednesday, September 19, 2018
By Gina Dizon
SAGADA, Mountain Province -- A
proposed research project on watersheds of Sisipitan, Kaman-ingel and Mengmeng
(SIKAME) of this tourist town was rejected by people of northern Sagada saying
it will disturb wildlife in the watershed areas among other reasons like
unresolved boundary issues with adjoining towns.
In an earlier August 11 consultation of the Cordillera
Highland Agricultural Resource Management Project2 (CHARMP2) with northern
barangays of Bangaan, Pide, Fidelisan, Madongo, Tanulong and Aguid, the people
opposed the research saying they don’t understand what the project was all
about as a prepared memorandum of agreement called for signatures from northern
Sagada constituents.
Another round of community consultation shall be set
following a meeting in Baguio City called by CHARMP2 with selected barangay
officials and leaders of northern Sagada.
In their declaration of no-consent forwarded to the
National Commission on Indigenous Peoples, the six barangay communities
referred to as Pidlisan tribe through their leaders said the people of Northern
Sagada don’t want any faunal assessment which will disturb wildlife in the
area.
They said they didn’t want sacred places
as “apoyan”, “bito” and “kak-aadingan” in their watershed areas.
The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA) provides
rights of cultural communities to allow or reject any research and
documentation with regard to right of indigenous cultural communities (ICCs) on
management, development, use and utilization of their resources within their
ancestral domain and ancestral lands.
CHARMP2 applied for issuance of a certification precondition in a
research study entitled watershed characterization as part of an ongoing
Sisipitan-Kaman-ingel Mengmeng joint integrated watershed planning to be conducted
within the “shared resource area” of the ancestral domains of Lacmaan, Agawa,
Gueday, Ambagiw, Tamboan of Besao; Aguid, Bangaan, Pide, Fidelisan, Tanulong
and Madongo of Sagada; Mainit of Bontoc; Belwang of Sadanga and Tubo of Abra.
CHARMP wants host communities to come up with a
watershed plan.
Some residents of northern Sagada said they will make their watershed
plan at their own pace and when they consider that a plan is needed.
CHARMP proposes a 5% share on total gross sales should
the research output be sold to the public. Nellie Bolinget, a member of
the Pidlisan tribe said in a separate interview that Pidlisan is not
for sale.
Residents in their certification of
non-consent also commented on the involvement of Mainit,
Bontoc and Belwang, Sadanga who don’t have any boundaries
in the identified watershed areas.
Besides, northern Sagada has pending boundary issues with Tubo, Abra so
how can the watersheds be “shared”, Kinaud said. She added that
Pidisan does not share any resource with Mainit nor Sadanga and don’t have any
agreement as to an already “shared” watershed as presented by CHARMP in the
proposed agreement.
In an interview, former Bangaan barangay chairman Osenio Lay-os who
joined the meeting in Baguio City said CHARMP looks forward to SIKAME being
declared as a protected area and to start livelihood projects with northern
barangays.
Bolinget said the Pidlisan people have long protected
the area including a joint ordinance that the mountains of northern Sagada are
not open to any trekking and tourism activities.
Northern Sagada is a favorite site of researches done
with the people including those on customary practices of the watershed
protection, communal irrigation, small scale mining and issues on land
privatization with government and non-government organizations.
CHARMP2 is now in its two year extension upscale project starting 2016
having finished its seven year contract from 2009 to
2015 funded by loans from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), IFAD (
International Fund for Agricultural Development), and the Organization of
the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Fund for International Development
(OFID). CHARMP2 with lead agency Department of Agriculture is a $66.4
million project with counterpart from the Philippine government.
0 comments:
Post a Comment