Baguio gov’t stops bidding, awarding of gov’t contracts
>> Tuesday, July 16, 2019
By
Jessa Mardy P. Samidan
BAGUIO
CITY -- Bidding and awarding of government contracts were held in abeyance for
a period of two weeks following the issuance of Executive Order No. 1, series
of 2019, penned by Mayor Benjamin Magalong in an aim to ensure compliance to
existing laws.
The order was issued
July 1 upon the assumption of Magalong as chief executive who sought to ensure
compliance to procurement laws in line with Republic Act 9184 or the Government
Procurement Reform Act and its implementing rules and regulations.
Magalong’s order to hold
in abeyance the bidding and award of contracts for two weeks is specifically
directed to the city’s Bids and Awards Committee for Infrastructure as well as
Goods and Services including Special Bids and Awards Committees, Secretariats
and Technical Working Groups.
“For the government
procurement committees to hold in abeyance for at least two weeks the award of
bided out infrastructure and services projects, until these are favorably
reviewed for contractual obligation. All other items programmed for bidding are
hereby put on hold for immediate review,” Magalong said in delivering his
marching orders upon assumption of office.
Also held in abeyance
for two weeks are any stage from preparations of bidding documents,
pre-procurement conference, invitation to bid, advertising of invitation to
bid, receipt opening of bids, preliminary examination of bids and bid
evaluation, post-qualification processes and the award of bid.
The EO seeks
transparency in the procurement process and in the implementation of
procurement contracts as well as ensure competitiveness by extending equal
opportunity to enable private contracting parties who are eligible and
qualified to participate in public bidding.
The Supreme Court’s Oani
versus People in GR No. 139984 dated March 31, 2005 was quoted by the EO in
upholding, “public bidding aims to protect public interest by giving the public
the best possible advantages through open competition that is legitimate, fair
and honest; and to avoid or preclude suspicion of favoritism and anomalies in
the execution of public contracts.
0 comments:
Post a Comment