Ex-Ilocos mayor convicted for graft, malverse of public funds
>> Saturday, October 12, 2019
STA. CATALINA, Ilocos Sur --Former Mayor Carlos Racadio
Asuncion of this town has been convicted of graft and malversation for the
misappropriation of public funds that was intended for the tobacco excise tax
back in 2012.
The Sandiganbayan Fourth
Division found Asuncion guilty of violating four counts of Section 3(e) of R.A.
3019 or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act and another four counts of
Section 3(j), together with private individuals Mamelfa Amongol, Rosita
Ragunjan, Virginia Rafanan, and Genova Requezo.
They were sentenced to
the indeterminate penalty of six years and one month as minimum to a maximum of
10 years imprisonment for each of count of graft, with perpetual
disqualification from holding public office.
Asuncion and the others
were likewise found guilty of four counts of violation of Article 217 of the
Revised Penal Code, also known as malversation, and sentenced to two years,
four months and one day of prision correccional as minimum to six years prision
correccional as maximum for each count.
They were also ordered
to pay a fine equivalent to the amount they malversed in each case. For
Asuncion, it is P400,000, while Amongol, Ragunjan, Rafanan, and Ragasa have to
pay P100,000 each. No civil liability is adjudged in view of the full restitution
of the amounts involved.
The charges stemmed from
the release of P100,000 from the municipality’s share of tobacco excise tax on
June 15, 2012, and its appropriation to four chapters of Bayanihan ng
Kababaihan, namely Cabittaogan, Subec, Paratong, and Sinabaan.
Asuncion had lack of
authority from the Sangguniang Bayan of Sta. Catalina, lack of proper
appropriation and non-compliance with Commission on Audit Circular No. 2007-01
when he offered financial assistance.
These organizations are
also unqualified to receive financial aid, given its lack of legal personality
and the fact that it is not an association of tobacco farmers.
The anti-graft court
said in its ruling that the prosecution managed to establish the accused’s
guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Asuncion was a public officer while the private
individuals acted in conspiracy with him to commit the crime.
Asuncion likewise acted
with evident bad faith when he approved the “financial assistance” and released
the funds in favor of the Bayanihan ng Kababaihan chapters.
The Bayanihan ng
Kababaihan and its chapters are clearly not organizations of tobacco farmers
who are entitled to the “financial assistance,” since they are duly registered
with the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) as “rural worker
associations.”
“There is nothing in the
subject certifications that would at least imply that the chapter members are
tobacco farmers,” the decision read.
Even if the Bayanihan ng
Kababaihan were indeed comprised of tobacco farmers, it still would not have
been valid since the chapters did not have the legal personality to receive the
financial assistance granted to them.
“Asuncion blindly gave
away public funds. The act of accused Asuncion of approving the release of said
public funds, despite being presumed to know the legalities that they would
entail, only leads to the indubitable conclusion that he knew that the
Bayanihan ng Kababaihan chapters were not qualified to receive the grants,” the
court said.
At the same time, no
contract may be entered by the local chief executive in behalf of the
municipality without the authorization of the Sanggunian concerned
The 33-page resolution
was penned by Chairperson Alex Quiroz with the concurrence of Associate
Justices Reynaldo Cruz and Bayani Jacinto.
0 comments:
Post a Comment