Army denies integration of rebs: CPLA seeks review of MOA with gov't
>> Tuesday, July 30, 2013
BAGUIO CITY – A
thorough review was sought by the former rebel group Cordillera People's
Liberation Army (CPLA) on the memorandum of agreement (MOA) it signed with the
Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP).
The request came after
12 candidate soldiers of the Philippine Army who were sons of former CPLA
members being trained for integration were rejected in the middle of the
training.
The Philippine Army
has reportedly denied reconsideration of its decision to drop the 12 trainees.
Arsenio Humiding,
leader of the CPLA group which signed a closure agreement with OPAPP last year,
is seeking a meeting with Sec. Teresita Quintos Deles to discuss the merit of
the MOA.
"It seems that we
are not headed to the direction which was intended,” Humiding said.
The closure agreement
with the CPLA under Humiding ended the group's orientation as an armed
movement.
Part of the MOA with
government is the integration of 168 willing and next-of-kin CPLA members into
the Armed Forces of the Philippines.
The clamor for a
review of the MOA is resonating within the ranks of the CPLA, Humiding said,
adding, “lumalabas na may mga hinaing tayo, may mga frustrations and we are
wondering if the government we are talking to is still listening to us.”
Humiding admitted
there are lapses in the signed MOA but said the CPLA is not to be blamed for
these, saying, “along the way may mag pagkakamali sa peace partners natin.”
Even the
infrastructure components of the MOA, particularly the Pamana program needs
rethinking, Humiding said as “a policy direction is needed in the
implementation of the MOA.”
The CPLA received P242
million to fund various projects all over the region as part of the Pamana
program.
The CPLA broke ranks
with the CPP-NPA in 1986 and has since joined government forces in fighting
rebels in the Cordillera.
Through the years, the
CPLA further splintered into several other factions, one of which was that of
Humiding’s which inked an agreement with government while other factions wanted
to remain as such.
1 comments:
CPLA got into an agreement complete with financial package that it be transformed into an economic force and lay down their arms and do livelihood programs.what happened? why the integration with the AFP? that closure agreement CPLA had with the govt is deceptive, misleading, confusing, and now they seek review to have them hold arms again?!with the AFP? after they got the financial package from the govt?Come on...
Post a Comment