Funded from Sen. Guingona’s PDAF: Abra execs demand stop to Sagada water project
>> Monday, September 16, 2013
By Gina Dizon
SAGADA,
Mountain Province – A project funded from the Priority Development Funds of
Sen. TeopistoGuingona to bring water to this tourist town is being protested by
officials and folks of adjacent Tubo town in Abra.
A meeting was held Sept. 9 in Baguio City between local government
officials of the municipalities of Tubo, Sagada including
Besao town also of Mountain Province with officers of Cordillera Highland
Agricultural Resource Management Program (CHARMP) to
settle the problem
Tubo officials and elders demanded that the Boasaw waterworks be
suspended considering there was no “free prior informed consent” among
concerned communities as required by law.
All parties agreed to return to their communities to get the stand first
of the people on the matter.
Implementation of the P36 million waterworks project included
construction of a 140 meter tunnel to let passage of a 6-inch diameter pipe
from the Boasaw Creek to reach 15 barangays of Sagada.
Tubo elder Francisco Cayasen said during recent meeting that
construction of the pipe tunnel did not observe FPIC from the people of Tubo.
The improvement of Buasaw irrigation system was funded
with P18 million from the PDAF) of Guingona and another P18 million from
CHARMP.
It was awarded to Cotabato-based FFJJ Construction and programmed for
construction in February 2012.
To make concerned LGUs be informed of Tubo’s sentiments, Tubo
officials passed a resolution dated June 26, 2012 protesting
the CHARMP project that draw waters from the Buasaw creek leading
to Sagada - irrigation canals for Tanulong
and Madongo rice fields and the main town’s domestic water
supply.
Former Sangguniang Bayan councilor Camilo Dalingay of Tubo who personally
delivered the resolution to Sagada Mayor Eduardo Latawan, said the recent
September meeting should have been prevented if Latawan kept his promise and
visited Tubo, June last year.
NCIP regional director Sancho Buquing in a separate interview said
issues- social and technical, raised by Tubo officials and elders should
have been resolved through FPIC process.
Tubo mayor Guilbert Ballangan said people of Tubo would be deprived of
the usual water volume going to seven affected barangays of the town with the
full implementation of the project.
Elder Francis Cayasen said an earlier agreement between Tanulong and
Tubo noted the latter’s consent to have the water flow diverted to Tanulong
“until the TuboMaeng tribe does not need it.”
The water naturally flows to Tubo
and the direct watershed is common grounds of Tanulong, Tubo and the adjacent
barangay of Agawa, Besao.
Cayasen said the release of water to Sagada is not the issue much as
Tubo allowed waters to flow to Sagada in the 1950s.
Tubo’s concern now was the decrease of water supply, he said.
Sagada councilor Eduardo Umaming raised questions on volume of
discharges of the Boasaw creek during the rainy and summer seasons of the
year.
A visit to the site has yet to be scheduled by representatives from
Sagada and Tubo.
Lack of consultations on the project was earlier aired within the Sagada
local government unit with protest from the former Sangguniang Bayan of Sagada
annulling their authorization for Latawan to enter into an agreement with
CHARMP due to claims that the project ends at sitio Capinitan and
servicing only three northern barangays instead of the intended destination to
15 Poblacion and eastern barangays.
Among questions on technical inconsistencies, the former
legislative body of the town noted discrepancies in number of proposed tanks to
identified sites in the feasibility study.
Questions led the leadership of Sagada LGU to ask for a five month
extension for CHARMP to thresh out issues before the 13-month project contract
could start August last year.
With Tubo’s June 2012 resolution not addressed by the current Sagada
leadership, the new leadership of Tubo forwarded another resolution to CHARMP
dated July 2013 to “please stop any CHARMP assisted project that draws water
from the Buasaw Creek”.
Said appeal was eventually addressed by the National Commission on
Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) who facilitated the September 9 meeting.
“We are the ones at a disadvantage here”, Tubo mayor Guilbert Ballangan
said when Latawan appealed to Tubo officials and elders not to suspend the
project.
Urged by the facilitator, a one on one talk between Latawan and
Ballangan led to the agreement of both municipal mayors that the waterworks
project shall continue and that other issues be discussed especially on
political boundaries.
Nevertheless, despite the mayors’ agreement, it would be subject to
consultation with their respective constituents.
Separate talks were agreed upon between Sagada and Tubo officials and
elders and respective constituents.
Separate talks were also planned for Besao and Tubo.
Besao sources irrigation and domestic water to Agawa barangay with
waters flowing from the same diverted flow going to Tanulong.
An excess of the waters going to Tanulong flows to the lower Besao dam
with waters leading to Agawa.
Boasaw watershed is a common resource ground of Tubo, Besao and Sagada
which is also hunting grounds.
Former mayor Thomas Killip and current consultant of the Office of the
Presidential Assistant on Peace Process (OPAPP) forwarded the need for
guidelines to be drawn up on collective watershed use, sharing and management
by adjacent communities accessing this.
Sagada Indigenous Peoples representative Jaime Dugao forwarded the need
for communities making use of the natural resource to conduct reforestation
activities and keep the waters flowing.
The Boasao project has only reached 30% completion as of September this
year.
CHARMP engineer Felimon Salvador assigned to monitor the water
works noted some 65% to 70% slippage rate of the 13 month project since
project was programmed to start February 2012.
As of now, the P36 million Boasaw waterworks is in the stage of
laying out pipelines from the main source to the 15 barangays of Sagada after
the recent completion of the 140 meter tunnel allowing shortened passage
of the water pipes from the Boasaw creek, preventing circuitous pipelines
around the mountain where the waters flow.
Project was earlier suspended following protest from the resolution of
the 2010-2013 SB of Sagada annulling their authorization allowing Latawan to enter into memorandum of agreement
with CHARMP.
The SB claimed the project plan ended only at sitio Capinitan
servicing only three northern barangays and not reaching other 12 Poblacion
and eastern barangays of Sagada.
Among technical inconsistencies, the legislative body noted
discrepancies in number of proposed tanks as to identified sites, and
utilization instead of more economical and durable materials such as plastic
pipes.
With the resolution of issues raised including logistics of where to get
additional funds to let pipes reach intended barangays and checking other
questioned technical plans, implementation was moved to August 2012 by CHARMP
following request by the LGU to CHARMP to extend date of implementation.
Not until Tubo questioned the project June of 2012 with the construction
of the 140 meter tunnel towards the end of 2012 noted the momentary stop of the
tunneling activities which resumed early 2013.
0 comments:
Post a Comment