Gun ban
>> Friday, January 25, 2019
LETTERS FROM THE AGNO
March Fianza
LA TRINIDAD, Benguet - Last week, cops from the Police
Regional Office Cordillera (PROCOR) arrested two gun-for-hire bosses and one of
their members for possessing illegal firearms, explosives and ammunition in Abra
by virtue of search warrant.
The guns and ammos confiscated from the
suspects were a hand grenade, a caliber .22 revolver without serial number, a
Smith & Wesson Caliber .38 revolver without serial number, live ammunitions
for several calibers, an improvised caliber 5.56 MM pistol with five empty
shells.
At the onset of the election period on
January 13, 2019, the police arrested four violators of the election gun ban in
the provinces of Kalinga and Abra.
In the 2013 election, implementation of
the Commission on Election gun ban resulted to the arrest of 883 persons and
confiscation of 692 firearms. In the 2016 elections, the number of
firearms confiscated, recovered, or surrendered reached 3,527.
In a column many years ago, I said the
loose firearms today were the guns seized yesterday. While authorities make
arrests and confiscations, the total gun ban measure that comes out before
every election cannot be implemented consistently and honestly.
As an initial step to stop the spread of
loose firearms, government might ponder on stopping the issuance of licenses so
that gun stores will practically close shop and the guns for sale will be
inventoried, properly receipted and temporarily kept in government-accredited
depositories for safekeeping.
The expected result is for both licensed
and unlicensed firearms not to be brought out. Guns owned by private persons
will be kept in the house and only law enforcers and enlisted military
personnel will be the ones seen carrying firearms.
When then President Marcos as
Commander-in-Chief of the AFP and the Philippine Constabulary declared Martial
Law in 1972, he issued a stern warning for known owners of unlicensed and
licensed guns to turn-over their pieces to the nearest police detachment for
safekeeping, or else face the consequences of an unceremonial house to house
search.
For fear of being raided and getting
killed in the process, many law-abiding gun owners surrendered their guns to
Camp Holmes (now Camp Dangwa). But after Martial Law was lifted in 1981, the
guns were never returned to their owners because the items were no longer
there.
Apparently, the firearms were taken or
stolen by the men tasked to “safekeep” them. That is why I said the guns that
were confiscated during Martial Law for “safekeeping” are today’s loose
firearms.
It looks like the culture of losing
confiscated items has become part of a faulty system in police agencies. We
know that confiscated drugs and carnap vehicles get lost while in the hands of
the police. Eventually, these items return to the streets where they were
confiscated. The drugs are resold while the cars are sold to innocent buyers.
Recall that in the Atimonan, Quezon rubout of personalities
allegedly involved in jueteng and illegal gambling in 2013, it turned out that
the SUVs that were riddled with bullets were alleged to be carnap vehicles.
Same thing with guns. These are
confiscated, get lost during safekeeping and resold to whoever buys them. Most
probably, these will end up in the armory of a politician warlord or a gambling
lord.
The guns may also end up in the armory of
police officials who are in cahoots with carnappers and gun-for-hire
characters. When government soldiers staged a coup in 2005, they complained
about corrupt AFP generals who have been selling government guns and ammo to
their enemies in war-torn Mindanao.
As proof to what they were griping about,
it was discovered in the investigations following the Maguindanao massacre that
the firearms hurriedly buried in the estate of the Ampatuans bore serial
numbers belonging to guns issued to the AFP.
Under a total gun ban atmosphere, only
law enforcement personnel will be allowed to carry government issued licensed
firearms. Although, there are PNP and AFP men who possess unlicensed guns,
despite being issued their official firearms.
In 2013, the PNP estimated that around
530,000 loose firearms have yet to be accounted for before the implementation
of the election gun ban during that election year. The number only
included licensed guns that were not renewed, but did not include smuggled and
unregistered firearms.
Luckily, despite the presence of loose
firearms in this country, there are no reported mass killings by gun-wielding
nuts, as compared to the US that had 1,042 mass killings since 2012. For 2013
alone, 353 mass killings was reported in the US.
In all the developed world, the United
States has the most liberal laws on gun ownership. In fact, the right to keep
and own firearms is enshrined in the second amendment of the US constitution.
It is therefore not surprising that it
has also the worst gun violence in the whole industrialized world and the
highest gun ownership in the world. The Philippines meanwhile, is one country
that has the strictest gun laws in the world. It is difficult to own and
license a firearm and much harder to get a permit to carry the firearm outside
one’s residence.
Actually, carrying a low caliber bullet
can land one in jail for six years. This is one of the reasons why the
extortion industry of “tanim-bala” (bullet planting) to extort money from
unsuspecting travelers has been going on for years.
But going back to the issue of gun
ownership in the country, the police estimated that there are more than 600,000
loose firearms in the country. This figure was arrived at by counting the
number of gun owners who failed to renew their licenses.
Although arguably, these firearms are
technically not loose in the sense that the location of the firearms are known.
Loose firearms are those that cannot be accounted for in the files of the
police. The latest estimate is that there are over a million of these loose firearms
all over the country.
Proof of this is that almost all gun
deaths are caused by untraceable firearms. Also, daily news never fails to
mention the number of people getting killed by firearms every day. Police
reports do not say how many people get killed by the use of firearms but the
figure may be close or even more than the US figure.
There is a distinction between the number
of homicide and murder. But if we were to add both, it would show that even
with very strict gun ownership laws, it is not a guarantee to a more peaceful
country. Maybe the trick is to have simpler rules that can be implemented
properly and efficiently.
Complicated rules only make it difficult
for responsible gun owners to comply and would only benefit the criminal who
does not want his gun to be registered. In this age of terrorism, government
must make sure that by strictly implementing the gun ban law, it must see to it
that law-abiding citizens have the means to protect themselves.
0 comments:
Post a Comment