Sagada land owner shrugs off rally against Kiltepan property
>> Thursday, March 6, 2014
SAGADA, Mountain Province – The legitimate
owner of a 3-hectare property in Kiltepan here shrugged off a recent rally
staged by some local residents against their duly documented claim of the
property, saying that such desperate actions of purported claimants, who are in
cahoots with a ranking municipal official, is just a rehash of old resolved
issues and a move to justify their alleged land grabbing activities.
Wilson Capuyan, the
duly recognized owner of the Kiltepan prime lot, said most of the rallyists
were the ones who were reportedly involved in the demolition of the fence and
gate which they erected over their property last year and that they were hired
by her own sister FelyOmengan and Mayor Eduardo Latawan to continue misleading
and is informing the people about the facts of the property which had already
been resolved several decades ago.
“The gathering done by
the hired people of the purported claimants over the purchased property is
simply to justify their desire to grab the property despite the issue of ownership
having been resolved by the courts,” Capuyan said.
Records show that the
ten cases that were filed in relation to the ownership of the property had been
resolved in favour of the Lam-ens and eventually the Capuyans.
The Capuyans bought
three hectares from the 31-hectare property of the Lam-ens in Kiltepan in the
1980s purposely to develop it as an ecotourism site and to help in providing an
added attraction for local and foreign tourists that will significantly
contribute in uplifting the town’s tourism industry.
According to him, the
lot was bought by the Capuyans but the municipal council in 2009 unilaterally
declared it as a park without just cause, due process and even without
compensation to the owners already in possession of the property.
Capuyan narrated that
it was only in 2010 or one year after the passage of the ordinance declaring
their property as a park that the representatives of the municipal government
came to him and inquired whether or not he will donate the property to be used
as a public facility.
However, he declined
the offer of the local government because improvements were already done within
the property and that the offer was done in bad faith considering that it was
made after the issue on proper consultation, due process and just cause was
raised against the declaration of the property as a park.
Capuyan asserted his
ownership over the property which had been previously upheld by the courts and
the previous gatherings and harassments done to them by the municipal
government and even his own sister clearly illustrates their alleged greed to
grab prime properties within the town which they will use to advance their own
personal and business interests depriving other people of their capability to
develop potential tourist destinations that would spice up the local tourism
industry. -- Dexter A. See
0 comments:
Post a Comment