A prayer for Pax Mundi
>> Sunday, December 23, 2018
PERRYSCOPE
Perry Diaz
Perry Diaz
Every
year, people around the world, regardless of their religious beliefs or
affiliation, celebrate Christmas. For one day of the year, December
25, people reach out to each other and to friends they haven’t seen or heard
from since last year or many years ago. Oftentimes, they send Christmas cards
with family pictures and short notes.
Christmas
is a day that Christians renew their faith in Jesus Christ. On
Christmas Day, families gather and have a feast and enjoy each other’s company
and exchange gifts. The festivity lasts till late at night singing
their favorite karaoke songs and line dancing until they’re
exhausted. And then it’s time to say goodbye, hug each other and
say, “Peace be with you.”
Christmas
Truce
Which
reminds me of the “Christmas Truce” during the First World War 104 years
ago. On Christmas Eve, the British and French armies were manning
the 27-mile Western Front fiercely defending French territory from the
advancing German Army. Across the British and French trenches, as near as 200
feet away, the Germans were dug in. What separated the opposing armies was a
place called “No Man’s Land.”
On Christmas Eve, one of the most incredible --
and unusual -- events in human history took place: the Germans started placing
candles on trees on “No
Man’s Land.”Lit with candles, the “Christmas” trees looked awesome.
The Germans began singing Christmas songs and the British and French troops
responded by singing too. Soon the entire “No Man’s Land” turned
into a symphonic Christmas celebration. The Germans proposed a “Christmas
truce” and the French and British troops accepted.
By Christmas morning, “No Man’s Land” was
filled with fraternizing soldiers, sharing rations and gifts, singing and more
solemnly burying their dead. Soon they were even playing soccer, mostly with
improvised balls. According to one account, “proper burials took place as
soldiers from both sides mourned together and paid their respect.”
When the generals heard about the “Christmas
truce,” they were aghast and ordered their soldiers to start shooting at each
other. The soldiers resumed shooting but most of them -- for several days --
aimed their rifles at the sky and the stars. In some sectors, the truce
continued until New Year’s Day. After all, how can “friends” shoot at each
other?
It happened again in the Korean Peninsula in
1953 when China and North Korea signed the Korean War Truce with the United
Nations and South Korea, which begs the question: Why can’t it
happen in the Philippines today? What is so difficult that we
Filipinos cannot settle our own differences? We need a truce with
the communist insurgents and Muslim separatists. It’s brother
against brother and nobody is winning. What’s keeping us
apart?
Periods
of peace in history
The Pax
Romana (Roman Peace) was the first period of peace that endured
for 206 years from 27 BC to AD 180. During this period, the Roman Empire
achieved its greatest territorial expansion and its population reached 70
million people -- a third of the world’s population at that
time. The decline of the empire began during the dictatorial reign
of Commodus. It marked the descent “from the kingdom of gold to one
of iron and rust.”
The Pax Mongolica (Mongol
Peace) was the relative peace that followed the conquests of Genghis Khan and
his successors in the 13th and 14th centuries. It stabilized the
social, cultural, and economic life of the people of the vast Eurasian
territory under the Mongol Empire.
It spanned from Southeast Asia to Eastern
Europe, effectively connecting the Eastern World with the Western
World. The famous Silk Road that linked the trade centers in Asia
and Europe came under the rule of the Mongols. The end of Pax
Mongolica was marked with the outbreak of the Black Death, which was spread
along the Silk Road in the mid-14th century.
The Pax Britannica (British
Peace) was the longest period of peace during the 17th, 18th, and 19th
centuries when the British Empire became the sole global power. The
empire’s navy controlled most of the trade routes and enjoyed unchallenged sea
domination. The outbreak of World War I marked the end of Pax
Britannica; however, some historians said that it was the Suez Canal crisis in
1956 that ended Pax Britannica.
Pax Americana (American Peace)
refers to the period after the end of the Cold War in 1989 with the fall of the
Soviet Empire. However, some historians pegged the beginning of Pax
Americana at the end of World War II at which time the United States gained
military and economic power unmatched by other nations. With the collapse
of the Soviet Empire and the end of the Cold War, the US became the sole
superpower. The US navy ruled the seas with 11 supercarrier battle
groups and around 70 nuclear-powered submarines.
The U.S. has airbases around the world and
large numbers of troops deployed to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
countries as well as Japan and South Korea.
Today, America’s two geopolitical rivals –
Russia and China – are jockeying for position to become the next world
hegemon. Indeed, China is vying to be the next world empire, Pax
Sinica (Chinese Peace). Currently, China is building
the new Silk Road known as “One Belt, One Road” (OBOR) that would link Asia,
Europe, and Africa. OBOR is the answer to Chinese President Xi Jinping’s “China
Dream,” which is to reshape global trade with Beijing at its
core. China would then become the world’s new imperial power.
Meanwhile, Russia is competing for world
dominance, too. Although not considered an economic power, Russia’s
military prowess is catching up with the U..S.’s military
capability. Would a Pax Russica (Russian
Peace) period emerge in the future? In a post-Putin era, the U.S.
and Russia could become strategic allies to counter Pax Sinica. Then
what?
But why not Pax Mundi (World
Peace)? The foundation for world peace was laid down when 51
countries established the United Nations (UN) in 1945 for the purpose of
maintaining international peace. The UN and its 15-member Security
Council operated with the goal of resolving conflicts without wars or
declarations of war. But oftentimes, the Security Council failed to
pass resolutions that would resolve conflicts because of the veto power vested
on each of the five permanent members, to wit: United States, United Kingdom,
France, China, and Russia.
During the Cold War, the Soviet
Union exercised its veto power 107 times out of the total number of 220 vetoes
cast. Needless to say, a Security Council permanent member can cast
a veto whenever the “national interest” of that country is
threatened.
With any one of the five permanent members
casting a “No” vote against a peace resolution in the Security Council, world
peace is imperiled. And that’s the reason why we will never achieve
Pax Mundi, which makes one wonder: While there are pros and cons about it, shouldn’t
the five permanent members be stripped of their “veto” power to make the UN a
truly democratic institution for world peace? Or would it lead to
more global conflicts?
At the end of the day, as we celebrate
Christmas, let’s give a prayer for Pax Mundi. Merry
Christmas. May peace be with you all.
0 comments:
Post a Comment