NLRC finds Radio Sagada committed illegal dismissal
>> Monday, June 13, 2016
By Gina
Dizon
SAGADA, Mountain
Province -- The National Labor Relations Court (NLRC)
reversed the decision of the labor arbiter dismissing
a labor case filed by complainant-employee Evelyn Piluden
against employer Radio Sagada Media Network.
Piluden was a part
time employee of Radio Sagada since October 2012 until she
was dismissed from her work May 2015 causing her
to file a case of illegal dismissal before the Department
of Labor (DOLE) on July 2015.
Labor Arbiter Raymund
Celino dismissed the case filed by Piluden having adapted the assertion
of Radio Sagada that Piluden is a part time employee who “insisted
on a full time employment which Radio Sagada cannot grant because
of its financial constraints.”
NLRC ruled
“there is no substantial evidence to prove that
Piluden insisted on a full time employment or that she refused continuance
of her part time employment after her request was denied. Even if
it be true that she insisted or reiterated her call to be employed
as full time such alone is not a ground to dismiss her.”
NLRC ruled
Piluden was dismissed with the “absence of a lawful ground. The lack of
due process was evident.”
Piluden
was first verbally terminated on May 8 , 2015 before she was
informed of the reasons on August 18, 2015 when she received the
board resolution terminating her.
The Labor Arbiter’s
decision caused Piluden to elevate her case to the NLRC which ruled
that Piluden was a regular employee who was illegally
dismissed without due process.
In their decision,
NLRC concurred with Piluden’s statement that she is a part time employee
and having rendered at least one year of service to Radio Sagada
Media Network as regular employee.
NLRC ruled that “the
designation of an employee whether as full time or part time only
referred to the number of hours he/she renders service on a
workday. If he/she renders the normal eight hours a day at work,
he/she is considered a full time employee. In other words it has no
bearing on the employee status of the worker. A regular employee can
either be a full time or a part time worker.”
NLRC further stated,
“The same protection afforded to full time workers should also be
extended to part time workers. Part time employees also enjoy security of
tenure, if they have attained regularity of employment by the nature of
their work or by sheer length of service. That the part time employee
also performs activities usually necessary or desirable to the
usual business or trade of the employer is an indicator of regular
employment.”
Article 20 of
the Labor Code states that an employment shall be deemed
regular where the employee has been engaged to perform activities
which are usually necessary or desirable in the usual business or trade.
By length of
services, Piluden’s work with Radio Sagada was at least or even more than
one year having been formally hired as Administrative
Assistant since October 2012. Her continuous employment with Radio
Sagada only indicates the continuing need or necessity for
her services if not indispensability of that activity to the
business of the employer, there is regularity of employment.
“Radio Sagada’s
assertion that Piluden was a mere contractual employee cannot prevail over
the dictates or implication of law as to what should be her status,” NLRC
stated in their 13 page decision.
The employment
status of a person is defined as prescribed by law and not what the
parties say it should be.
NLRC granted
Piluden’s reinstatement. However since there is already strained
relations between employer and the employee, separation pay is
granted instead.
NLRC further ruled
Piluden is entitled to full backwages from the time she was illegally dismissed
on May 8, 2015 and separation pay covering her service computed
from her date of engagement both awards to be computed until final judgment.
0 comments:
Post a Comment